QCGRIX vs. VYM
QCGRIX (CREF Growth Account Class R3) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both funds - QCGRIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TIAA-CREF, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. QCGRIX is actively managed, while VYM is passively managed. Over the past year, QCGRIX returned 28.01% vs 27.70% for VYM. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QCGRIX charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
QCGRIX vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCGRIX achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.96% return.
QCGRIX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 5.80%
- YTD
- 10.02%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 28.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VYM
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 13.69%
- 1Y
- 27.70%
- 3Y*
- 19.05%
- 5Y*
- 11.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.94%
QCGRIX vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QCGRIX CREF Growth Account Class R3 | 10.02% | 14.41% | 0.00% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.96% | 15.42% | -0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCGRIX and VYM is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCGRIX vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
QCGRIX
VYM
QCGRIX vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCGRIX | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.77 | 2.71 | -0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.38 | 3.84 | -1.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.49 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 4.20 | -2.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.88 | 15.80 | -9.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCGRIX | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 2.71 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.51 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
QCGRIX vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCGRIX drawdown since its inception was -23.93%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCGRIX and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCGRIX | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.93% | -56.98% | +33.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.69% | -6.69% | -10.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -7.20% | +2.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 1.78% | +3.24% |
Volatility
QCGRIX vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.88%. This indicates that QCGRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCGRIX | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | 2.88% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 7.73% | +4.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.66% | 10.27% | +6.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 13.96% | +6.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 16.34% | +4.52% |
QCGRIX vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCGRIX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QCGRIX vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
QCGRIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCGRIX CREF Growth Account Class R3 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.18% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCGRIX and VYM have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCGRIX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to VYM (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCGRIX dropped -23.93% vs VYM's -56.98%.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCGRIX and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer