PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCGRIX vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCGRIX vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCGRIX achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.96% return.


QCGRIX

1D
0.80%
1M
5.80%
YTD
10.02%
6M
9.03%
1Y
28.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VYM

1D
1.24%
1M
2.98%
YTD
12.96%
6M
13.69%
1Y
27.70%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
11.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCGRIX vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QCGRIX
CREF Growth Account Class R3
10.02%14.41%0.00%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.96%15.42%-0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between QCGRIX and VYM is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCGRIX vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCGRIX
QCGRIX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
QCGRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCGRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCGRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
QCGRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCGRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCGRIX vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QCGRIXVYMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

2.71

-0.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.38

3.84

-1.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.49

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

4.20

-2.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.88

15.80

-9.92

QCGRIX vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCGRIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCGRIX and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QCGRIXVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

2.71

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.51

+0.35

Drawdowns

QCGRIX vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCGRIX drawdown since its inception was -23.93%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCGRIX and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCGRIXVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.93%

-56.98%

+33.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.69%

-6.69%

-10.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-7.20%

+2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

1.78%

+3.24%

Volatility

QCGRIX vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.88%. This indicates that QCGRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCGRIXVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

2.88%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

7.73%

+4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.66%

10.27%

+6.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.86%

13.96%

+6.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.86%

16.34%

+4.52%

QCGRIX vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCGRIX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QCGRIX vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

QCGRIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QCGRIX
CREF Growth Account Class R3
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.18%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


QCGRIX and VYM have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCGRIX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to VYM (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCGRIX dropped -23.93% vs VYM's -56.98%.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCGRIX and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer