PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCGRIX vs. QCSTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCGRIX vs. QCSTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) and CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R3 (QCSTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCGRIX achieves a 5.58% return, which is significantly lower than QCSTIX's 12.58% return.


QCGRIX

1D
-1.30%
1M
-1.21%
YTD
5.58%
6M
4.37%
1Y
21.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QCSTIX

1D
-0.04%
1M
2.27%
YTD
12.58%
6M
11.90%
1Y
28.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCGRIX vs. QCSTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QCGRIX
CREF Growth Account Class R3
5.58%14.41%0.00%
QCSTIX
CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R3
12.58%20.05%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between QCGRIX and QCSTIX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2024

0.88

The correlation between QCGRIX and QCSTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCGRIX vs. QCSTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCGRIX
QCGRIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
QCGRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCGRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCGRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
QCGRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCGRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

QCSTIX
QCSTIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QCSTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCSTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCSTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QCSTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCSTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCGRIX vs. QCSTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) and CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R3 (QCSTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QCGRIXQCSTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.40

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

3.02

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.43

13.09

-8.66

QCGRIX vs. QCSTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCGRIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the QCSTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCGRIX and QCSTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QCGRIX vs. QCSTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCGRIX drawdown since its inception was -23.93%, which is greater than QCSTIX's maximum drawdown of -16.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCGRIX and QCSTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCGRIXQCSTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.93%

-16.98%

-6.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.69%

-9.95%

-6.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.03%

-0.15%

-3.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-2.01%

-2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.12%

2.28%

+2.84%

Volatility

QCGRIX vs. QCSTIX - Volatility Comparison

CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R3 (QCSTIX) at 5.35%. This indicates that QCGRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCSTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCGRIXQCSTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

5.35%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.53%

11.30%

+2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.52%

13.68%

+3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.03%

15.50%

+5.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.03%

15.50%

+5.53%

Dividends

QCGRIX vs. QCSTIX - Dividend Comparison

Neither QCGRIX nor QCSTIX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QCGRIX and QCSTIX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCGRIX has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to QCSTIX (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCGRIX dropped -23.93% vs QCSTIX's -16.98%.

QCSTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCGRIX and QCSTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer