QBY vs. XRMI

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

QBY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF) and XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. QBY is actively managed, while XRMI is passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QBY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XRMI.

Performance

QBY vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBY achieves a -26.67% return, which is significantly lower than XRMI's 2.19% return.

QBY

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: -26.67%
• 6M: -31.10%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XRMI

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 2.19%
• 6M: 2.05%
• 1Y: 10.09%
• 3Y*: 7.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBY vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QBY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF	-26.67%	-8.88%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	2.19%	1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between QBY and XRMI is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025	0.39

Return for Risk

QBY vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XRMI

XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 53
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 61
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBY vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QBY	XRMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.85	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.58	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.36	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.02	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.14	—

Drawdowns

QBY vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBY drawdown since its inception was -38.93%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBY and XRMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBY	XRMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.93%	-15.31%	-23.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.02%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.71%	0.00%	-33.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.96%	-5.88%	-20.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.24%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QBY	XRMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.61%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.41%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.87%	5.50%	+26.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.87%	6.91%	+24.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.87%	6.91%	+24.96%

QBY vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QBY vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison

QBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 114.26%, more than XRMI's 13.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QBY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF	114.26%	15.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	13.71%	12.35%	11.86%	12.62%	12.84%	2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBY and XRMI in my portfolio?

QBY and XRMI have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QBY or XRMI?

On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QBY or XRMI?

XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for QBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QBY or XRMI?

QBY has the higher dividend yield at 114.26%, compared with 13.71% for XRMI.

What is the main difference between QBY and XRMI?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for QBY and 0.60% for XRMI.