QBY vs. IPDP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QBY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. QBY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.

Performance

QBY vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QBY

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 1.65%
• YTD: -25.84%
• 6M: -31.16%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPDP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBY vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QBY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF	-4.94%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

QBY vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QBY	IPDP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.63	—	—

Drawdowns

QBY vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBY drawdown since its inception was -38.93%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBY and IPDP.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBY	IPDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.93%	0.00%	-38.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.95%	0.00%	-32.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.40%	0.00%	-25.40%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QBY	IPDP	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.96%	0.00%	+32.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.96%	0.00%	+32.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.96%	0.00%	+32.96%

QBY vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

QBY vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

QBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 101.11%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%	0.00%
QBY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF	101.11%	15.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, QBY or IPDP?

On fees, QBY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QBY or IPDP?

QBY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QBY or IPDP?

QBY has the higher dividend yield at 101.11%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between QBY and IPDP?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for QBY and 1.52% for IPDP.