QBY vs. AMDY

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

QBY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QBY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for AMDY.

Performance

QBY vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBY achieves a -29.71% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 117.25% return.

QBY

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: -2.52%
• 6M: -30.04%
• YTD: -29.71%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDY

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: 9.68%
• 6M: 127.92%
• YTD: 117.25%
• 1Y: 201.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBY vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QBY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF	-29.71%	-8.88%
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	117.25%	2.16%

Correlation

The correlation between QBY and AMDY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025	0.46

Return for Risk

QBY vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMDY

AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 94
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 93
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBY vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QBY	AMDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.62	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.78	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.52	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	7.49	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	16.67	—

Drawdowns

QBY vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBY drawdown since its inception was -38.93%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBY and AMDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBY	AMDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.93%	-53.92%	+14.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-27.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.45%	-2.42%	-34.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.67%	-17.54%	-9.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	12.38%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QBY	AMDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	19.17%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	44.94%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.75%	57.13%	-26.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.75%	47.15%	-16.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.75%	47.15%	-16.40%

QBY vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 1.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

QBY vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

QBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 132.09%, more than AMDY's 64.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	64.46%	80.68%	109.98%	6.68%
QBY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF	132.09%	15.05%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBY and AMDY in my portfolio?

QBY and AMDY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QBY or AMDY?

On fees, QBY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QBY or AMDY?

QBY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QBY or AMDY?

QBY has the higher dividend yield at 132.09%, compared with 64.46% for AMDY.

What is the main difference between QBY and AMDY?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax ETFs. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for QBY and 1.23% for AMDY.