QBUL vs. QFLR

Last updated Apr 4, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR).

QBUL and QFLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QBUL is an actively managed fund by TrueShares. It was launched on Jun 28, 2024. QFLR is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Jan 24, 2024.

Performance

QBUL vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QBUL vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QBUL TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF	-0.62%	4.87%	0.58%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	-2.07%	17.27%	5.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBUL achieves a -0.62% return, which is significantly higher than QFLR's -2.07% return.

QBUL

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: -0.62%
• 6M: -1.38%
• 1Y: 4.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QFLR

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: -2.07%
• 6M: 0.90%
• 1Y: 26.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBUL vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

QFLR

Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF

QBUL

TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF

Return for Risk

QBUL vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBUL

QBUL Risk / Return Rank: 47
QBUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
QBUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
QBUL Omega Ratio Rank: 49
QBUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
QBUL Martin Ratio Rank: 27

QFLR

QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 87
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 85
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBUL vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QBUL	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	1.90	-0.79
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	2.60	-0.98
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.36	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	3.11	-1.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.91	13.16	-10.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QBUL vs. QFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the QFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBUL and QFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QBUL	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	1.90	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	1.12	-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between QBUL and QFLR is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

QBUL vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

QBUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.00%, while QFLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024
QBUL TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF	9.00%	8.94%	1.82%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.03%

Drawdowns

QBUL vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBUL drawdown since its inception was -2.45%, smaller than the maximum QFLR drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBUL and QFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBUL	QFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.45%	-13.97%	+11.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.45%	-7.61%	+5.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.08%	-4.63%	+2.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.00%	-2.62%	+1.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.18%	1.80%	-0.62%

Volatility

QBUL vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) is 0.73%, while Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that QBUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QBUL	QFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.73%	4.83%	-4.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.47%	9.49%	-7.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.54%	12.32%	-8.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.78%	12.88%	-9.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.78%	12.88%	-9.10%