QBUL vs. JANZ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

QBUL (TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF) and JANZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QBUL is a Options Trading fund actively managed by TrueShares, while JANZ is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by TrueShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QBUL returned 4.70% vs 19.50% for JANZ. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

QBUL vs. JANZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBUL achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly lower than JANZ's 7.23% return.

QBUL

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 1.54%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 4.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JANZ

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 7.23%
• 6M: 6.71%
• 1Y: 19.50%
• 3Y*: 15.42%
• 5Y*: 10.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBUL vs. JANZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QBUL TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF	1.54%	4.87%	0.58%
JANZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF	7.23%	12.47%	6.19%

Correlation

The correlation between QBUL and JANZ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2024	0.67

The correlation between QBUL and JANZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QBUL vs. JANZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBUL

QBUL Risk / Return Rank: 34
QBUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
QBUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
QBUL Omega Ratio Rank: 35
QBUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
QBUL Martin Ratio Rank: 28

JANZ

JANZ Risk / Return Rank: 62
JANZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
JANZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
JANZ Omega Ratio Rank: 60
JANZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
JANZ Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBUL vs. JANZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QBUL	JANZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.97	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	2.71	-1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.35	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	2.87	-0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.71	12.22	-8.51

QBUL vs. JANZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the JANZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBUL and JANZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QBUL vs. JANZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBUL drawdown since its inception was -2.45%, smaller than the maximum JANZ drawdown of -18.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBUL and JANZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBUL	JANZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.45%	-18.11%	+15.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.45%	-6.83%	+4.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.33%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.24%	-1.47%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.98%	-3.47%	+2.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.27%	1.60%	-0.33%

Volatility

QBUL vs. JANZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) is 1.80%, while TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that QBUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JANZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QBUL	JANZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.80%	3.83%	-2.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.79%	7.80%	-5.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.90%	9.95%	-6.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.92%	13.22%	-9.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.92%	13.00%	-9.08%

QBUL vs. JANZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QBUL and JANZ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

QBUL vs. JANZ - Dividend Comparison

QBUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.81%, more than JANZ's 1.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JANZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF	1.32%	1.42%	2.70%	2.58%	0.21%	4.52%
QBUL TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF	8.81%	8.94%	1.82%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBUL and JANZ in my portfolio?

QBUL and JANZ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QBUL or JANZ?

JANZ has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to QBUL (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBUL dropped -2.45% vs JANZ's -18.11%.

Which ETF is better, QBUL or JANZ?

On 1-year performance, JANZ leads with 19.50% vs 4.70% for QBUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, QBUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QBUL or JANZ?

Over the 1-year period, JANZ has performed better with a 19.50% return vs 4.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QBUL or JANZ?

QBUL and JANZ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QBUL or JANZ?

QBUL has the higher dividend yield at 8.81%, compared with 1.32% for JANZ.

What is the main difference between QBUL and JANZ?

QBUL is categorized as Options Trading, while JANZ is Defined Outcome.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JANZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.