QBTX vs. ARMG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QBTX (Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF) and ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Over the past year, QBTX returned -32.21% vs 510.84% for ARMG. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QBTX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARMG.

Performance

QBTX vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBTX achieves a -34.37% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 936.32% return.

QBTX

• 1D: -16.05%
• 1M: 46.29%
• YTD: -34.37%
• 6M: -37.13%
• 1Y: -32.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMG

• 1D: 4.85%
• 1M: 261.28%
• YTD: 936.32%
• 6M: 526.62%
• 1Y: 510.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBTX vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF	-34.37%	318.19%
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF	936.32%	-26.65%

Correlation

The correlation between QBTX and ARMG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025	0.26

Return for Risk

QBTX vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBTX

QBTX Risk / Return Rank: 14
QBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
QBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
QBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
QBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
QBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

ARMG

ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 84
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 77
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBTX vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QBTX	ARMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	3.96	-4.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	3.63	-2.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.46	-0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	7.56	-7.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.48	13.34	-13.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QBTX vs. ARMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the ARMG Sharpe Ratio of 3.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBTX and ARMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QBTX	ARMG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15	3.96	-4.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	1.24	-0.62

Drawdowns

QBTX vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTX drawdown since its inception was -95.48%, which is greater than ARMG's maximum drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTX and ARMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBTX	ARMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.48%	-80.28%	-15.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-95.48%	-68.13%	-27.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-84.84%	0.00%	-84.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.06%	-53.04%	-3.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	67.01%	38.55%	+28.46%

Volatility

QBTX vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) has a higher volatility of 77.32% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) at 64.57%. This indicates that QBTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QBTX	ARMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	77.32%	64.57%	+12.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	149.16%	103.90%	+45.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	214.79%	130.31%	+84.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	241.97%	138.30%	+103.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	241.97%	138.30%	+103.67%

QBTX vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

QBTX vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison

QBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.11%, more than ARMG's 0.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF	0.47%	4.86%
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF	20.11%	13.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBTX and ARMG in my portfolio?

QBTX and ARMG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QBTX or ARMG?

QBTX has higher volatility (77.32%) compared to ARMG (64.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBTX dropped -95.48% vs ARMG's -80.28%.

Which ETF is better, QBTX or ARMG?

On 1-year performance, ARMG leads with 510.84% vs -32.21% for QBTX. On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ARMG has been the lower-risk option at 64.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QBTX or ARMG?

Over the 1-year period, ARMG has performed better with a 510.84% return vs -32.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QBTX or ARMG?

ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QBTX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QBTX or ARMG?

QBTX has the higher dividend yield at 20.11%, compared with 0.47% for ARMG.

What is the main difference between QBTX and ARMG?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QBTX and 0.75% for ARMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.