QBIG vs. QLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QBIG (Invesco Top QQQ ETF) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - QBIG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Invesco, while QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). QBIG is actively managed, while QLD is passively managed. Over the past year, QBIG returned 35.93% vs 85.49% for QLD. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QBIG charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QLD.

Performance

QBIG vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBIG achieves a 8.80% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 42.06% return.

QBIG

• 1D: -1.97%
• 1M: 3.99%
• YTD: 8.80%
• 6M: 6.39%
• 1Y: 35.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QLD

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 21.54%
• YTD: 42.06%
• 6M: 37.45%
• 1Y: 85.49%
• 3Y*: 50.15%
• 5Y*: 25.75%
• 10Y*: 36.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBIG vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QBIG Invesco Top QQQ ETF	8.80%	21.46%	3.04%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	42.06%	30.36%	-4.98%

Correlation

The correlation between QBIG and QLD is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024	0.92

The correlation between QBIG and QLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

QBIG vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QBIG	QLD
Technology	19.4%	53.8%
Financial Services	14.8%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	12.3%
Communication Services	6.0%	15.8%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Energy	-	0.6%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Industrials	-	2.8%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

QBIG vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBIG

QBIG Risk / Return Rank: 45
QBIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
QBIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
QBIG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
QBIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
QBIG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 69
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBIG vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QBIG	QLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	2.70	-0.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	3.16	-0.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.41	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	3.42	-1.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.73	11.92	-6.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QBIG vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBIG and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QBIG	QLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.86	2.70	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.60	+0.25

Drawdowns

QBIG vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBIG drawdown since its inception was -30.33%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBIG and QLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBIG	QLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.33%	-83.13%	+52.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.70%	-25.13%	+5.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-42.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-63.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.34%	-0.53%	-2.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.02%	-18.17%	+11.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.29%	7.20%	-0.91%

Volatility

QBIG vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) is 5.32%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 8.90%. This indicates that QBIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QBIG	QLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.32%	8.90%	-3.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.64%	24.08%	-9.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.43%	31.85%	-12.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.32%	44.74%	-17.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.32%	44.56%	-17.24%

QBIG vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBIG has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

QBIG vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

QBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QBIG Invesco Top QQQ ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.12%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBIG and QLD in my portfolio?

QBIG and QLD have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QBIG or QLD?

QLD has higher volatility (8.90%) compared to QBIG (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBIG dropped -30.33% vs QLD's -83.13%.

Which ETF is better, QBIG or QLD?

On 1-year performance, QLD leads with 85.49% vs 35.93% for QBIG. On fees, QBIG is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QBIG has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QBIG or QLD?

Over the 1-year period, QLD has performed better with a 85.49% return vs 35.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QBIG or QLD?

QBIG is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QBIG or QLD?

QLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for QBIG.

What is the main difference between QBIG and QLD?

QBIG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QLD is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QBIG and 0.95% for QLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.