PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBIG vs. MAGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QBIG vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QBIG vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QBIG
Invesco Top QQQ ETF
-10.30%21.46%3.04%
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
-11.04%22.99%1.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBIG achieves a -10.30% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's -11.04% return.


QBIG

1D
1.27%
1M
-3.81%
YTD
-10.30%
6M
-8.80%
1Y
28.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGS

1D
1.28%
1M
-4.76%
YTD
-11.04%
6M
-8.69%
1Y
27.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QBIG vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QBIG and MAGS have an expense ratio of 0.29%.


Return for Risk

QBIG vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBIG
QBIG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
QBIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBIG Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QBIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

MAGS
MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBIG vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QBIGMAGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

0.97

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

1.58

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.60

-0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.02

5.57

-0.55

QBIG vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the MAGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBIG and MAGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QBIGMAGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

0.97

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

1.36

-1.03

Correlation

The correlation between QBIG and MAGS is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QBIG vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

QBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%.


TTM202520242023
QBIG
Invesco Top QQQ ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
1.66%1.48%0.81%0.44%

Drawdowns

QBIG vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBIG drawdown since its inception was -30.33%, roughly equal to the maximum MAGS drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBIG and MAGS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QBIGMAGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.33%

-29.91%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.70%

-18.62%

-1.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.20%

-13.78%

-1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.41%

-4.77%

-2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.13%

5.36%

+0.77%

Volatility

QBIG vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) is 7.80%, while Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a volatility of 8.50%. This indicates that QBIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QBIGMAGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.80%

8.50%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.33%

15.51%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.57%

28.70%

-1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.18%

26.28%

+1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.18%

26.28%

+1.90%