QB vs. JULB
QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. QB is passively managed, while JULB is actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QB charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.
Performance
QB vs. JULB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QB achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly higher than JULB's 6.35% return.
QB
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 10.47%
- 6M
- 9.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULB
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 6.35%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QB vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 10.47% | 3.04% |
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 6.35% | 2.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between QB and JULB is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QB vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QB | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.17 | 2.17 | +1.00 |
Drawdowns
QB vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QB drawdown since its inception was -1.83%, smaller than the maximum JULB drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QB and JULB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QB | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -5.24% | +3.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -0.07% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.34% | -0.87% | +0.53% |
Volatility
QB vs. JULB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QB | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.75% | 6.81% | -1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.75% | 6.81% | -1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.75% | 6.81% | -1.06% |
QB vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison
QB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
QB vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison
QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while JULB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 0.62% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QB and JULB have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QB.
QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for JULB.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QB and 0.25% for JULB.
Find the right allocation for QB and JULB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer