QB vs. JULB

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. QB is passively managed, while JULB is actively managed. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QB charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.

Performance

QB vs. JULB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QB achieves a 15.61% return, which is significantly higher than JULB's 9.75% return.

QB

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: 4.09%
• 6M: 15.00%
• YTD: 15.61%
• 1Y: 22.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.28%

JULB

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 2.13%
• 6M: 8.93%
• YTD: 9.75%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	$150.89K	$164.82K	$229.85K
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	$54.67K	$35.27K	$152.35K

QB vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	15.61%	3.02%
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	9.75%	2.44%

Correlation

The correlation between QB and JULB is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025	0.77

Return for Risk

QB vs. JULB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QB

QB Risk / Return Rank: 96
QB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
QB Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
QB Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QB Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
QB Martin Ratio Rank: 97

JULB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QB vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QB	JULB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.05	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.54	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.73	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.37	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	30.57	—	—

Drawdowns

QB vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QB drawdown since its inception was -3.47%, smaller than the maximum JULB drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QB and JULB.

Drawdown Indicators

	QB	JULB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.47%	-5.24%	+1.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.41%	-0.77%	+0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QB	JULB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.40%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.11%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.29%	6.88%	+0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.05%	6.88%	+0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.05%	6.88%	+0.17%

QB vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison

QB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

QB vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison

QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while JULB has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	0.75%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QB and JULB in my portfolio?

QB and JULB have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QB or JULB?

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QB or JULB?

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QB or JULB?

QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.00% for JULB.

What is the main difference between QB and JULB?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QB and 0.25% for JULB.