PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QARP vs. EASG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QARP vs. EASG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QARP achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly higher than EASG's 11.08% return.


QARP

1D
0.52%
1M
1.69%
6M
8.81%
YTD
13.09%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.16%

EASG

1D
-0.71%
1M
0.27%
6M
5.95%
YTD
11.08%
1Y
23.37%
3Y*
13.72%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$107.99K$79.19K$91.05K
$110.48K$118.49K$177.11K

QARP vs. EASG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
13.09%13.99%18.94%23.03%-14.62%31.82%14.83%30.70%-9.55%
EASG
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF
11.08%25.19%2.26%18.80%-16.94%11.36%10.73%23.66%-5.41%

Correlation

The correlation between QARP and EASG is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2018

0.75

The correlation between QARP and EASG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

QARP vs. EASG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QARP
EASG

Technology

24.1%
14.8%

Healthcare

14.0%
11.0%

Financial Services

12.4%
24.7%

Communication Services

10.5%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
6.7%

Industrials

7.9%
17.5%

Energy

6.3%
2.7%

Basic Materials

2.5%
5.7%

Utilities

1.9%
3.7%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.7%

Technology

QARP
24.1%
EASG
14.8%

Healthcare

QARP
14.0%
EASG
11.0%

Financial Services

QARP
12.4%
EASG
24.7%

Communication Services

QARP
10.5%
EASG
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

QARP
9.5%
EASG
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QARP
9.4%
EASG
6.7%

Industrials

QARP
7.9%
EASG
17.5%

Energy

QARP
6.3%
EASG
2.7%

Basic Materials

QARP
2.5%
EASG
5.7%

Utilities

QARP
1.9%
EASG
3.7%

Real Estate

QARP
1.0%
EASG
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QARP vs. EASG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

EASG
EASG Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EASG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
EASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
EASG Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QARP vs. EASG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QARPEASGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.26

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

1.97

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.08

7.39

+7.70

QARP vs. EASG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QARP Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the EASG Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QARP and EASG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QARP vs. EASG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QARP drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, which is greater than EASG's maximum drawdown of -32.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QARP and EASG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QARPEASGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.44%

-32.06%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

-11.74%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.65%

-16.14%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-31.42%

+8.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.79%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-6.09%

+1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

3.12%

-1.50%

Volatility

QARP vs. EASG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) is 2.59%, while Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that QARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EASG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QARPEASGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

4.39%

-1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

13.55%

-5.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.71%

16.16%

-5.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.52%

16.78%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.51%

18.32%

+1.19%

QARP vs. EASG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QARP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than EASG's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QARP vs. EASG - Dividend Comparison

QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than EASG's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EASG
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF
3.83%4.18%2.93%2.51%2.47%2.69%1.70%2.94%0.85%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.02%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


QARP and EASG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EASG has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to QARP (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QARP dropped -35.44% vs EASG's -32.06%.

On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 11.83% vs 7.51% for EASG. On fees, EASG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 11.83% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EASG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.

EASG has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 1.02% for QARP.

QARP is categorized as Quality Factor, while EASG is Foreign Large Cap Equities. QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index, while EASG tracks MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for QARP and 0.14% for EASG.

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QARP and EASG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer