QARP vs. CCOR
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR).
QARP and CCOR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QARP is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. It was launched on Apr 5, 2018. CCOR is an actively managed fund by Core Alternative Capital. It was launched on May 24, 2017.
Performance
QARP vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QARP vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 0.13% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -5.53% |
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | -0.34% | 3.52% | -5.70% | -11.92% | 2.51% | 9.90% | 4.07% | 6.03% | 7.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QARP achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -0.34% return.
QARP
- 1D
- 2.20%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 3.95%
- 1Y
- 15.36%
- 3Y*
- 15.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.09%
- 10Y*
- —
CCOR
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- -1.48%
- 3Y*
- -3.32%
- 5Y*
- -0.93%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QARP vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QARP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QARP vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank
QARP
CCOR
QARP vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QARP | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | -0.14 | +1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | -0.14 | +1.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.98 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | -0.19 | +1.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.99 | -0.35 | +7.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QARP | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | -0.14 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | -0.08 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.15 | +0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between QARP and CCOR is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QARP vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison
QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than CCOR's 1.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.14% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% | 0.00% |
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.02% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 1.53% | 0.89% |
Drawdowns
QARP vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QARP drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QARP and CCOR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QARP | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.44% | -22.99% | -12.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -9.17% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.75% | -22.99% | +0.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.23% | -17.23% | +12.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -7.07% | +2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 4.95% | -2.59% |
Volatility
QARP vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 2.17%. This indicates that QARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QARP | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 2.17% | +2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.15% | 5.44% | +2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.84% | 10.74% | +5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 11.13% | +4.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.81% | 10.81% | +9.00% |