PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QAI vs. AGOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QAI vs. AGOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF (AGOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QAI achieves a 7.67% return, which is significantly lower than AGOX's 16.81% return.


QAI

1D
0.25%
1M
-0.72%
6M
5.22%
YTD
7.67%
1Y
12.58%
3Y*
8.67%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
3.74%
ALL TIME*
3.49%

AGOX

1D
0.91%
1M
-2.77%
6M
12.41%
YTD
16.81%
1Y
16.30%
3Y*
14.16%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.70M$2.48M$2.81M
$2.04M$2.05M$2.17M

QAI vs. AGOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QAI
NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
7.67%8.29%6.67%10.07%-8.68%-0.63%
AGOX
Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF
16.81%8.58%15.97%19.07%-19.21%8.91%

Correlation

The correlation between QAI and AGOX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021

0.70

The correlation between QAI and AGOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (3 years) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QAI vs. AGOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QAI
QAI Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
QAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAI Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAI Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

AGOX
AGOX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
AGOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
AGOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QAI vs. AGOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF (AGOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QAIAGOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.16

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

1.02

+2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.62

3.43

+8.18

QAI vs. AGOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the AGOX Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QAI and AGOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QAI vs. AGOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QAI drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, smaller than the maximum AGOX drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAI and AGOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QAIAGOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.95%

-26.93%

+11.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.71%

-15.32%

+11.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.78%

-21.15%

+13.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.32%

-26.93%

+12.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.90%

-5.98%

+4.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-8.04%

+5.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

4.52%

-3.44%

Volatility

QAI vs. AGOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) is 1.82%, while Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF (AGOX) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that QAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QAIAGOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.82%

5.32%

-3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.78%

16.77%

-10.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.85%

19.22%

-12.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.71%

19.81%

-13.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.24%

19.64%

-13.40%

QAI vs. AGOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QAI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than AGOX's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

QAI vs. AGOX - Dividend Comparison

QAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than AGOX's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGOX
Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF
2.76%3.23%3.94%0.27%0.20%6.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QAI
NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
1.40%1.50%2.22%4.08%2.00%0.28%1.98%1.91%1.90%0.00%0.00%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


QAI and AGOX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGOX has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to QAI (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QAI dropped -14.95% vs AGOX's -26.93%.

On 5-year performance, AGOX leads with 7.88% vs 4.39% for QAI. On fees, QAI is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QAI has been the lower-risk option at 1.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AGOX has performed better with a 7.88% return vs 4.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QAI is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for AGOX.

AGOX has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 1.40% for QAI.

QAI is categorized as Long-Short, while AGOX is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Adaptive. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QAI and 1.33% for AGOX.

QAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QAI and AGOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer