PZLV vs. VFLO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PZLV (Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) and VFLO (Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. PZLV is actively managed, while VFLO is passively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PZLV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for VFLO.

Performance

PZLV vs. VFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (PZLV) and Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PZLV

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VFLO

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 10.20%
• YTD: 20.78%
• 6M: 21.57%
• 1Y: 39.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PZLV vs. VFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PZLV Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	12.17%
VFLO Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF	19.75%

Correlation

The correlation between PZLV and VFLO is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026	0.57

Return for Risk

PZLV vs. VFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFLO

VFLO Risk / Return Rank: 87
VFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
VFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
VFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
VFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
VFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZLV vs. VFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (PZLV) and Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PZLV	VFLO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	6.63	1.65	+4.98

Drawdowns

PZLV vs. VFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZLV drawdown since its inception was -2.30%, smaller than the maximum VFLO drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZLV and VFLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PZLV	VFLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-17.79%	+15.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.52%	+1.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.64%	-2.42%	+1.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PZLV	VFLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.02%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.05%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.20%	14.98%	-0.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.20%	15.93%	-1.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.20%	15.93%	-1.73%

PZLV vs. VFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZLV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VFLO's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

PZLV vs. VFLO - Dividend Comparison

PZLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
PZLV Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VFLO Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF	1.18%	1.60%	1.20%	0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PZLV and VFLO in my portfolio?

PZLV and VFLO have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PZLV or VFLO?

On fees, VFLO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PZLV or VFLO?

VFLO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PZLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PZLV or VFLO?

VFLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.00% for PZLV.

What is the main difference between PZLV and VFLO?

They also come from different issuers: Pzena and Victory. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PZLV and 0.39% for VFLO.