PZLV vs. ROE
PZLV (Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) and ROE (Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PZLV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ROE.
Performance
PZLV vs. ROE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PZLV
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROE
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 6.88%
- YTD
- 21.08%
- 6M
- 21.44%
- 1Y
- 38.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PZLV vs. ROE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PZLV Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 12.17% |
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF | 19.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZLV and ROE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZLV vs. ROE — Risk / Return Rank
PZLV
ROE
PZLV vs. ROE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (PZLV) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PZLV | ROE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 6.63 | 1.39 | +5.24 |
Drawdowns
PZLV vs. ROE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZLV drawdown since its inception was -2.30%, smaller than the maximum ROE drawdown of -19.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZLV and ROE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZLV | ROE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -19.10% | +16.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -2.58% | +1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.91% | — |
Volatility
PZLV vs. ROE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZLV | ROE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.20% | 13.92% | +0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.20% | 15.77% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.20% | 15.77% | -1.57% |
PZLV vs. ROE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZLV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ROE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PZLV vs. ROE - Dividend Comparison
PZLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PZLV Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF | 0.94% | 0.97% | 1.18% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PZLV and ROE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PZLV.
ROE has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for PZLV.
They also come from different issuers: Pzena and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PZLV and 0.49% for ROE.
Find the right allocation for PZLV and ROE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer