PZG vs. HYMC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC).

Performance

PZG vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PZG vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.	38.10%	268.42%	-8.80%	8.70%	-50.62%	-40.29%	51.28%	-6.82%	-35.16%
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation	47.45%	975.57%	-9.80%	-53.96%	-13.30%	-92.18%	-24.03%	4.59%	3.02%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PZG : $136.48M HYMC : $1.52B
EPS PZG : $0.04 HYMC : -$1.24
PB Ratio PZG : 4.79 HYMC : 7.10
Total Revenue (TTM) PZG : $0.00 HYMC : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) PZG : -$952.37K HYMC : $0.00
EBITDA (TTM) PZG : -$667.38K HYMC : -$27.62M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZG achieves a 38.10% return, which is significantly lower than HYMC's 47.45% return.

PZG

• 1D: 4.82%
• 1M: -32.56%
• YTD: 38.10%
• 6M: 42.62%
• 1Y: 359.10%
• 3Y*: 70.83%
• 5Y*: 10.84%
• 10Y*: 2.20%

HYMC

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -37.12%
• YTD: 47.45%
• 6M: 435.11%
• 1Y: 1,068.33%
• 3Y*: 100.88%
• 5Y*: -2.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PZG vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PZG

PZG Risk / Return Rank: 98
PZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
PZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PZG Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PZG Martin Ratio Rank: 99

HYMC

HYMC Risk / Return Rank: 99
HYMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
HYMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
HYMC Omega Ratio Rank: 97
HYMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
HYMC Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZG vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PZG	HYMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	5.00	9.12	-4.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.45	4.90	-0.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.62	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.60	21.26	-12.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	30.39	55.79	-25.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PZG vs. HYMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZG Sharpe Ratio is 5.00, which is lower than the HYMC Sharpe Ratio of 9.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZG and HYMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PZG	HYMC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.00	9.12	-4.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18	-0.02	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.06	-0.10	+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between PZG and HYMC is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PZG vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison

Neither PZG nor HYMC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PZG vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZG drawdown since its inception was -93.81%, smaller than the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZG and HYMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PZG	HYMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.81%	-98.89%	+5.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.07%	-46.18%	+3.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-74.53%	-95.83%	+21.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-90.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-60.63%	-77.84%	+17.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.60%	-63.04%	-5.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.18%	17.60%	-5.42%

Volatility

PZG vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) is 18.75%, while Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a volatility of 36.09%. This indicates that PZG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PZG	HYMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.75%	36.09%	-17.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.79%	96.91%	-39.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.47%	118.74%	-46.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.05%	152.45%	-90.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.60%	123.72%	-63.12%

Financials