PZG vs. CMTL
PZG (Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.) and CMTL (Comtech Telecommunications Corp.) are both stocks. PZG operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while CMTL operates in Communication Equipment (Technology). Over the past 10 years, PZG returned -7.02%/yr vs -17.06%/yr for CMTL. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PZG vs. CMTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZG achieves a -11.11% return, which is significantly higher than CMTL's -68.24% return. Over the past 10 years, PZG has outperformed CMTL with an annualized return of -7.02%, while CMTL has yielded a comparatively lower -17.06% annualized return.
PZG
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- 6M
- -36.72%
- YTD
- -11.11%
- 1Y
- 73.81%
- 3Y*
- 52.15%
- 5Y*
- 4.47%
- 10Y*
- -7.02%
- ALL TIME*
- -5.93%
CMTL
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -12.95%
- 6M
- -69.78%
- YTD
- -68.24%
- 1Y
- -18.05%
- 3Y*
- -44.99%
- 5Y*
- -41.20%
- 10Y*
- -17.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $592.68K | $748.96K | $1.76M | |
| $464.35K | $496.83K | $763.62K |
PZG vs. CMTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. | -11.11% | 268.42% | -8.80% | 8.70% | -50.62% | -40.29% | 51.28% | -6.82% | -36.15% | -26.97% |
CMTL Comtech Telecommunications Corp. | -68.24% | 31.92% | -52.43% | -30.04% | -47.10% | 16.52% | -40.46% | 48.02% | 11.56% | 91.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZG and CMTL is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2006 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
PZG:
$96.08M
CMTL:
$50.34M
PZG:
-$0.08
CMTL:
-$478.22K
PZG:
$0.00
CMTL:
$106.00T
PZG:
-$892.14K
CMTL:
$36.07T
PZG:
-$11.01M
CMTL:
$1.52T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZG vs. CMTL — Risk / Return Rank
PZG
CMTL
PZG vs. CMTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) and Comtech Telecommunications Corp. (CMTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PZG | CMTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.04 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | -0.31 | +1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | -0.75 | +3.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PZG vs. CMTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZG drawdown since its inception was -93.81%, roughly equal to the maximum CMTL drawdown of -96.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZG and CMTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZG | CMTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.81% | -96.69% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.30% | -72.99% | +12.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.30% | -90.21% | +29.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.73% | -95.27% | +24.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.08% | -96.42% | +8.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.66% | -95.55% | +20.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.60% | -47.63% | -20.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.12% | 30.29% | +0.83% |
Volatility
PZG vs. CMTL - Volatility Comparison
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) has a higher volatility of 19.46% compared to Comtech Telecommunications Corp. (CMTL) at 17.90%. This indicates that PZG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZG | CMTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.46% | 17.90% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.01% | 84.11% | -28.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.21% | 92.19% | -17.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.58% | 92.74% | -29.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.34% | 75.31% | -14.97% |
Dividends
PZG vs. CMTL - Dividend Comparison
Neither PZG nor CMTL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMTL Comtech Telecommunications Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.19% | 3.29% | 1.69% | 1.93% | 1.13% | 1.64% | 1.81% | 10.13% | 5.97% |
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PZG vs. CMTL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. and Comtech Telecommunications Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PZG and CMTL have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PZG has higher volatility (19.46%) compared to CMTL (17.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZG dropped -93.81% vs CMTL's -96.69%.
PZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PZG and CMTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer