PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYZ vs. PIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYZ vs. PIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYZ achieves a 19.31% return, which is significantly lower than PIE's 39.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PYZ having a 10.27% annualized return and PIE not far behind at 10.06%.


PYZ

1D
-0.54%
1M
1.05%
YTD
19.31%
6M
22.21%
1Y
44.91%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
8.03%
10Y*
10.27%

PIE

1D
0.14%
1M
3.80%
YTD
39.30%
6M
38.92%
1Y
68.66%
3Y*
23.57%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYZ vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYZ
Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF
19.31%28.01%2.54%9.56%-15.45%32.68%15.39%20.66%-24.33%20.01%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
39.30%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%41.80%

Correlation

The correlation between PYZ and PIE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2007

0.63

The correlation between PYZ and PIE shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PYZ vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PYZ
PIE

Basic Materials

86.3%
3.2%

Industrials

13.7%
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
1.3%

Energy

3.8%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

0.6%
0.4%

Communication Services

-

1.4%

Financial Services

-

14.4%

Healthcare

-

5.1%

Real Estate

-

3.6%

Technology

-

47.0%

Utilities

-

1.3%

Basic Materials

PYZ
86.3%
PIE
3.2%

Industrials

PYZ
13.7%
PIE
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PYZ
4.2%
PIE
1.3%

Energy

PYZ
3.8%
PIE
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

PYZ
0.6%
PIE
0.4%

Communication Services

PYZ

-

PIE
1.4%

Financial Services

PYZ

-

PIE
14.4%

Healthcare

PYZ

-

PIE
5.1%

Real Estate

PYZ

-

PIE
3.6%

Technology

PYZ

-

PIE
47.0%

Utilities

PYZ

-

PIE
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYZ vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYZ
PYZ Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYZ vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYZPIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.54

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

6.99

-4.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.38

22.90

-14.52

PYZ vs. PIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the PIE Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYZ and PIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYZPIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

3.16

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.35

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.47

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.12

+0.25

Drawdowns

PYZ vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYZ drawdown since its inception was -65.15%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYZ and PIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYZPIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.15%

-72.98%

+7.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.75%

-9.87%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.74%

-28.69%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.97%

-40.32%

+7.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.46%

-40.32%

-12.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-1.04%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.64%

-26.08%

+13.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.37%

3.01%

+2.36%

Volatility

PYZ vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) is 7.44%, while Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a volatility of 8.88%. This indicates that PYZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYZPIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

8.88%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.12%

17.74%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.52%

21.87%

+3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.70%

20.23%

+5.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.43%

21.34%

+5.09%

PYZ vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYZ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYZ vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison

PYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than PIE's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.70%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%
PYZ
Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF
0.52%0.72%1.13%1.19%1.18%0.33%1.04%1.38%1.20%0.53%1.07%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYZ and PIE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIE has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to PYZ (7.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYZ dropped -65.15% vs PIE's -72.98%.

On 10-year performance, PYZ leads with 10.27% vs 10.06% for PIE. On fees, PYZ is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PYZ has been the lower-risk option at 7.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PYZ has performed better with a 10.27% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PYZ is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

PIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.52% for PYZ.

PYZ tracks Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Technical Leaders Index, while PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PYZ and 0.90% for PIE.

PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYZ and PIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer