PYZ vs. MXI
PYZ (Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF) and MXI (iShares Global Materials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PYZ is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Technical Leaders Index, while MXI is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PYZ returned 10.24%/yr vs 11.38%/yr for MXI. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PYZ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for MXI.
Performance
PYZ vs. MXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYZ achieves a 14.78% return, which is significantly higher than MXI's 11.62% return. Over the past 10 years, PYZ has underperformed MXI with an annualized return of 10.24%, while MXI has yielded a comparatively higher 11.38% annualized return.
PYZ
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 14.78%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- 1Y
- 37.65%
- 3Y*
- 16.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.24%
MXI
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 29.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
PYZ vs. MXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYZ Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF | 14.78% | 28.01% | 2.54% | 9.56% | -15.45% | 32.68% | 15.39% | 20.66% | -24.33% | 20.01% |
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 11.62% | 27.43% | -8.25% | 14.37% | -9.09% | 15.06% | 22.31% | 22.19% | -16.06% | 30.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYZ and MXI is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006 | 0.83 |
The correlation between PYZ and MXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
PYZ vs. MXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PYZ
MXI
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
PYZ
MXI
Industrials
PYZ
MXI
Consumer Cyclical
PYZ
MXI
Energy
PYZ
MXI
-
Consumer Defensive
PYZ
MXI
Financial Services
PYZ
MXI
-
Communication Services
PYZ
-
MXI
-
Healthcare
PYZ
-
MXI
-
Real Estate
PYZ
-
MXI
-
Technology
PYZ
-
MXI
-
Utilities
PYZ
-
MXI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYZ vs. MXI — Risk / Return Rank
PYZ
MXI
PYZ vs. MXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) and iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PYZ | MXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 1.85 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.94 | 7.13 | -0.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PYZ vs. MXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYZ drawdown since its inception was -65.15%, roughly equal to the maximum MXI drawdown of -68.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYZ and MXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYZ | MXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.15% | -68.44% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.75% | -16.18% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.74% | -22.25% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.97% | -28.76% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.46% | -39.52% | -12.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.41% | -7.43% | +2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.61% | -18.03% | +5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.44% | 4.19% | +1.25% |
Volatility
PYZ vs. MXI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) has a higher volatility of 8.54% compared to iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) at 8.08%. This indicates that PYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYZ | MXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.54% | 8.08% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.88% | 17.94% | +2.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.51% | 20.66% | +5.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.76% | 19.86% | +5.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.48% | 20.42% | +6.06% |
PYZ vs. MXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYZ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MXI's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
PYZ vs. MXI - Dividend Comparison
PYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than MXI's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 1.72% | 2.22% | 3.24% | 2.92% | 4.84% | 3.51% | 1.21% | 3.64% | 2.77% | 1.76% | 1.31% | 3.64% |
PYZ Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF | 0.47% | 0.72% | 1.13% | 1.19% | 1.18% | 0.33% | 1.04% | 1.38% | 1.20% | 0.53% | 1.07% | 1.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PYZ and MXI have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PYZ has higher volatility (8.54%) compared to MXI (8.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYZ dropped -65.15% vs MXI's -68.44%.
On 10-year performance, MXI leads with 11.38% vs 10.24% for PYZ. On fees, MXI is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, MXI has been the lower-risk option at 8.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MXI has performed better with a 11.38% return vs 10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MXI is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PYZ.
MXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.47% for PYZ.
PYZ is categorized as Momentum, while MXI is Materials. PYZ tracks Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Technical Leaders Index, while MXI tracks S&P Global Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PYZ and 0.46% for MXI.
MXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PYZ and MXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer