PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYZ vs. MXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYZ vs. MXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) and iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYZ achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly lower than MXI's 10.45% return. Over the past 10 years, PYZ has underperformed MXI with an annualized return of 8.18%, while MXI has yielded a comparatively higher 10.43% annualized return.


PYZ

1D
-0.87%
1M
-3.79%
6M
-2.06%
YTD
7.61%
1Y
25.31%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
8.18%
ALL TIME*
9.40%

MXI

1D
-2.15%
1M
-1.96%
6M
1.26%
YTD
10.45%
1Y
28.15%
3Y*
10.42%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*
10.43%
ALL TIME*
6.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.58M$1.75M$2.67M
$185.18K$258.85K$695.61K

PYZ vs. MXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYZ
Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF
7.61%28.01%2.54%9.56%-15.45%32.68%15.39%20.66%-24.33%20.01%
MXI
iShares Global Materials ETF
10.45%27.43%-8.25%14.37%-9.09%15.06%22.31%22.19%-16.06%30.33%

Correlation

The correlation between PYZ and MXI is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006

0.83

The correlation between PYZ and MXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

PYZ vs. MXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PYZ
MXI

Basic Materials

81.7%
93.7%

Industrials

18.3%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
4.9%

Energy

1.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.6%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.3%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

0.5%

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

PYZ
81.7%
MXI
93.7%

Industrials

PYZ
18.3%
MXI
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PYZ
4.2%
MXI
4.9%

Energy

PYZ
1.1%
MXI

-

Consumer Defensive

PYZ
0.6%
MXI
0.6%

Financial Services

PYZ
0.3%
MXI

-

Communication Services

PYZ

-

MXI

-

Healthcare

PYZ

-

MXI

-

Real Estate

PYZ

-

MXI

-

Technology

PYZ

-

MXI
0.5%

Utilities

PYZ

-

MXI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYZ vs. MXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PYZ
PYZ Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

MXI
MXI Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXI Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXI Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PYZ vs. MXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) and iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PYZMXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.23

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

1.72

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.99

5.64

-1.65

PYZ vs. MXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the MXI Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYZ and MXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PYZ vs. MXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYZ drawdown since its inception was -65.15%, roughly equal to the maximum MXI drawdown of -68.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYZ and MXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYZMXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.15%

-68.44%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.75%

-16.18%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.74%

-22.25%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.97%

-28.76%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.46%

-39.52%

-12.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.32%

-8.41%

-2.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.59%

-17.98%

+5.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.17%

4.91%

+1.26%

Volatility

PYZ vs. MXI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) is 5.38%, while iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that PYZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYZMXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

6.48%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.47%

18.38%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.68%

20.95%

+5.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.51%

19.92%

+5.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.42%

20.42%

+6.00%

PYZ vs. MXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYZ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MXI's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYZ vs. MXI - Dividend Comparison

PYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than MXI's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MXI
iShares Global Materials ETF
1.73%2.22%3.24%2.92%4.84%3.51%1.21%3.64%2.77%1.76%1.31%3.64%
PYZ
Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF
0.50%0.72%1.13%1.19%1.18%0.33%1.04%1.38%1.20%0.53%1.07%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYZ and MXI have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXI has higher volatility (6.48%) compared to PYZ (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYZ dropped -65.15% vs MXI's -68.44%.

On 10-year performance, MXI leads with 10.43% vs 8.18% for PYZ. On fees, MXI is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, PYZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MXI has performed better with a 10.43% return vs 8.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MXI is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PYZ.

MXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.50% for PYZ.

PYZ is categorized as Momentum, while MXI is Materials. PYZ tracks Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Technical Leaders Index, while MXI tracks S&P Global Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PYZ and 0.46% for MXI.

MXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYZ and MXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer