PYACX vs. PYSBX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PYACX (Payden Corporate Bond Fund) and PYSBX (Payden Low Duration Fund) are both mutual funds - PYACX is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by Paydenfunds, while PYSBX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Paydenfunds. Over the past 10 years, PYACX returned 2.96%/yr vs 2.27%/yr for PYSBX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PYACX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for PYSBX.

Performance

PYACX vs. PYSBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) and Payden Low Duration Fund (PYSBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYACX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than PYSBX's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, PYACX has outperformed PYSBX with an annualized return of 2.96%, while PYSBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.

PYACX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.91%
• YTD: 0.47%
• 6M: 0.26%
• 1Y: 5.95%
• 3Y*: 5.57%
• 5Y*: 0.66%
• 10Y*: 2.96%

PYSBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 6M: 1.00%
• 1Y: 4.04%
• 3Y*: 4.79%
• 5Y*: 2.41%
• 10Y*: 2.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYACX vs. PYSBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PYACX Payden Corporate Bond Fund	0.47%	7.39%	3.17%	8.53%	-16.33%	-0.08%	8.64%	14.46%	-3.05%	8.53%
PYSBX Payden Low Duration Fund	0.63%	5.72%	5.03%	4.96%	-3.40%	-0.23%	3.46%	3.92%	1.00%	1.48%

Correlation

The correlation between PYACX and PYSBX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010	0.56

The correlation between PYACX and PYSBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.66 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PYACX vs. PYSBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYACX

PYACX Risk / Return Rank: 24
PYACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
PYACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
PYACX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
PYACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
PYACX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

PYSBX

PYSBX Risk / Return Rank: 63
PYSBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
PYSBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PYSBX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
PYSBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PYSBX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYACX vs. PYSBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) and Payden Low Duration Fund (PYSBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PYACX	PYSBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	2.05	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	3.96	-1.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.50	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	2.87	-0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.85	10.34	-4.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PYACX vs. PYSBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the PYSBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYACX and PYSBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PYACX	PYSBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.42	2.05	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	1.14	-1.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	1.20	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.55	+0.26

Drawdowns

PYACX vs. PYSBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYACX drawdown since its inception was -22.90%, which is greater than PYSBX's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYACX and PYSBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYACX	PYSBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.90%	-6.65%	-16.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.20%	-1.41%	-1.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.43%	-1.41%	-5.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.90%	-5.46%	-17.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.90%	-6.65%	-16.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.38%	-0.28%	-1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.84%	-0.53%	-3.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.04%	0.39%	+0.65%

Volatility

PYACX vs. PYSBX - Volatility Comparison

Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to Payden Low Duration Fund (PYSBX) at 0.61%. This indicates that PYACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYSBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYACX	PYSBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.51%	0.61%	+0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.22%	1.47%	+1.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.28%	1.98%	+2.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.65%	2.13%	+4.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.87%	1.90%	+3.97%

PYACX vs. PYSBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYACX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PYSBX's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

PYACX vs. PYSBX - Dividend Comparison

PYACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than PYSBX's 4.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PYACX Payden Corporate Bond Fund	4.59%	4.54%	4.59%	3.89%	3.35%	5.32%	3.87%	3.37%	3.65%	3.92%	5.49%	4.36%
PYSBX Payden Low Duration Fund	4.39%	4.32%	4.27%	2.93%	1.87%	1.06%	2.50%	2.14%	2.30%	1.57%	1.24%	1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PYACX and PYSBX in my portfolio?

PYACX and PYSBX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PYACX or PYSBX?

PYACX has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to PYSBX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYACX dropped -22.90% vs PYSBX's -6.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PYSBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.