PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYSBX vs. PYARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYSBX vs. PYARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Low Duration Fund (PYSBX) and Payden Absolute Return Bond Fund (PYARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYSBX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than PYARX's 0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, PYSBX has underperformed PYARX with an annualized return of 2.24%, while PYARX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.31% annualized return.


PYSBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.79%
1Y
3.61%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
2.39%
10Y*
2.24%

PYARX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.93%
6M
1.20%
1Y
4.32%
3Y*
5.91%
5Y*
3.44%
10Y*
3.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYSBX vs. PYARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYSBX
Payden Low Duration Fund
0.32%5.72%5.03%4.96%-3.40%-0.23%3.46%3.92%1.00%1.48%
PYARX
Payden Absolute Return Bond Fund
0.93%5.84%7.55%6.22%-2.74%1.13%2.81%5.52%0.95%3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PYSBX and PYARX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.46

The correlation between PYSBX and PYARX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYSBX vs. PYARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYSBX
PYSBX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PYSBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYSBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYSBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
PYSBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYSBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

PYARX
PYARX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PYARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYARX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PYARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYARX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYSBX vs. PYARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Low Duration Fund (PYSBX) and Payden Absolute Return Bond Fund (PYARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PYSBXPYARXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.62

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

2.26

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.97

9.19

-0.22

PYSBX vs. PYARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYSBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the PYARX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYSBX and PYARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PYSBX vs. PYARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYSBX drawdown since its inception was -6.65%, smaller than the maximum PYARX drawdown of -15.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYSBX and PYARX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYSBXPYARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-15.70%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.41%

-1.96%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.41%

-2.18%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.46%

-6.12%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.65%

-15.70%

+9.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.11%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.53%

-0.72%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

0.48%

-0.08%

Volatility

PYSBX vs. PYARX - Volatility Comparison

Payden Low Duration Fund (PYSBX) has a higher volatility of 0.64% compared to Payden Absolute Return Bond Fund (PYARX) at 0.30%. This indicates that PYSBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYSBXPYARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

0.30%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.51%

1.37%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00%

1.73%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.14%

2.35%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.91%

2.84%

-0.93%

PYSBX vs. PYARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYSBX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than PYARX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYSBX vs. PYARX - Dividend Comparison

PYSBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than PYARX's 6.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYARX
Payden Absolute Return Bond Fund
6.24%6.69%6.68%5.18%3.59%2.24%2.50%3.15%3.41%2.54%2.52%2.16%
PYSBX
Payden Low Duration Fund
4.41%4.32%4.27%2.93%1.87%1.06%2.50%2.14%2.30%1.57%1.24%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYSBX and PYARX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYSBX has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to PYARX (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYSBX dropped -6.65% vs PYARX's -15.70%.

PYARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYSBX and PYARX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer