PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PKBIX vs. PYCBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PKBIX vs. PYCBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund (PKBIX) and Payden Core Bond Fund (PYCBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKBIX achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly higher than PYCBX's 0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, PKBIX has outperformed PYCBX with an annualized return of 3.60%, while PYCBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.08% annualized return.


PKBIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.50%
YTD
1.41%
6M
2.06%
1Y
5.94%
3Y*
6.75%
5Y*
3.84%
10Y*
3.60%

PYCBX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.28%
6M
0.52%
1Y
6.12%
3Y*
4.77%
5Y*
0.54%
10Y*
2.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKBIX vs. PYCBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PKBIX
Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund
1.41%6.75%8.14%6.21%-3.89%3.97%1.89%6.36%0.79%3.19%
PYCBX
Payden Core Bond Fund
0.28%7.69%2.55%6.57%-13.55%-1.00%6.93%9.27%-1.26%5.25%

Correlation

The correlation between PKBIX and PYCBX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2008

0.34

Over the past year, PKBIX and PYCBX have become more correlated (0.65) than their long-term average of 0.34, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PKBIX vs. PYCBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKBIX
PKBIX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PKBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PKBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PYCBX
PYCBX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PYCBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYCBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYCBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PYCBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYCBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKBIX vs. PYCBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund (PKBIX) and Payden Core Bond Fund (PYCBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PKBIXPYCBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.98

1.52

+1.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.63

2.27

+2.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.27

+0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

2.02

+1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.35

6.02

+7.33

PKBIX vs. PYCBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKBIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is higher than the PYCBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKBIX and PYCBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PKBIXPYCBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.98

1.52

+1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.48

0.09

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.08

0.44

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.95

+0.17

Drawdowns

PKBIX vs. PYCBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.17%, roughly equal to the maximum PYCBX drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKBIX and PYCBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKBIXPYCBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.17%

-18.59%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.90%

-2.97%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.11%

-6.23%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.05%

-18.59%

+11.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.17%

-18.59%

-0.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.59%

+1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.92%

-2.41%

+1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

1.00%

-0.56%

Volatility

PKBIX vs. PYCBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund (PKBIX) is 0.56%, while Payden Core Bond Fund (PYCBX) has a volatility of 1.34%. This indicates that PKBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYCBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKBIXPYCBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

1.34%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.59%

2.78%

-1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97%

3.81%

-1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.60%

5.73%

-3.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.33%

4.70%

-1.37%

PKBIX vs. PYCBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PKBIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PYCBX's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

PKBIX vs. PYCBX - Dividend Comparison

PKBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, more than PYCBX's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PKBIX
Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund
8.14%8.25%6.95%5.55%1.94%2.18%3.57%3.32%3.27%2.50%1.70%2.00%
PYCBX
Payden Core Bond Fund
4.57%4.78%4.63%3.76%3.21%2.39%3.96%3.04%3.27%3.13%3.85%2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


PKBIX and PYCBX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYCBX has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to PKBIX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKBIX dropped -19.17% vs PYCBX's -18.59%.

PKBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PKBIX and PYCBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer