PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PY vs. VLUE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PY vs. VLUE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Value ETF (PY) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PY achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than VLUE's 49.00% return. Over the past 10 years, PY has underperformed VLUE with an annualized return of 10.73%, while VLUE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.43% annualized return.


PY

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.70%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.52%
1Y
14.24%
3Y*
13.22%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
10.73%

VLUE

1D
-0.42%
1M
20.77%
YTD
49.00%
6M
51.40%
1Y
91.45%
3Y*
34.26%
5Y*
16.36%
10Y*
15.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PY vs. VLUE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PY
Principal Value ETF
4.14%7.74%16.79%9.11%-5.10%34.83%2.71%26.87%-13.34%18.87%
VLUE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
49.00%32.67%7.25%14.26%-14.17%28.93%-0.23%27.20%-11.13%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PY and VLUE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016

0.70

The correlation between PY and VLUE shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PY vs. VLUE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PY
VLUE

Technology

25.0%
44.5%

Financial Services

16.5%
10.4%

Healthcare

12.0%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

11.5%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
8.3%

Industrials

9.3%
7.4%

Energy

5.6%
3.2%

Communication Services

5.1%
8.3%

Utilities

1.7%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.2%
1.6%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.8%

Technology

PY
25.0%
VLUE
44.5%

Financial Services

PY
16.5%
VLUE
10.4%

Healthcare

PY
12.0%
VLUE
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

PY
11.5%
VLUE
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PY
11.0%
VLUE
8.3%

Industrials

PY
9.3%
VLUE
7.4%

Energy

PY
5.6%
VLUE
3.2%

Communication Services

PY
5.1%
VLUE
8.3%

Utilities

PY
1.7%
VLUE
2.0%

Basic Materials

PY
1.2%
VLUE
1.6%

Real Estate

PY
1.1%
VLUE
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PY vs. VLUE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PY
PY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PY Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PY Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VLUE
VLUE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
VLUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLUE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
VLUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLUE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PY vs. VLUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Value ETF (PY) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYVLUEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.91

-0.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

10.17

-7.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.73

45.62

-37.88

PY vs. VLUE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PY Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the VLUE Sharpe Ratio of 5.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PY and VLUE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYVLUEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

5.32

-3.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.92

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.78

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.76

-0.23

Drawdowns

PY vs. VLUE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PY drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than VLUE's maximum drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PY and VLUE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYVLUEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.44%

-39.47%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.20%

-9.04%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.84%

-17.89%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.84%

-27.12%

+9.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.44%

-39.47%

-5.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-0.42%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-6.01%

+0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

2.01%

-0.16%

Volatility

PY vs. VLUE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Value ETF (PY) is 2.28%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a volatility of 8.03%. This indicates that PY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYVLUEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

8.03%

-5.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.28%

13.96%

-6.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.53%

17.30%

-6.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.77%

17.78%

-2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.07%

19.82%

+0.25%

PY vs. VLUE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PY and VLUE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PY vs. VLUE - Dividend Comparison

PY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than VLUE's 1.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PY
Principal Value ETF
2.13%2.14%2.22%2.68%3.02%2.83%2.95%2.25%2.34%1.68%1.85%0.00%
VLUE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
1.40%2.11%2.73%2.66%3.18%2.22%2.42%2.61%2.70%2.14%2.07%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


PY and VLUE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VLUE has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to PY (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PY dropped -45.44% vs VLUE's -39.47%.

On 10-year performance, VLUE leads with 15.43% vs 10.73% for PY. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, PY has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 15.43% return vs 10.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PY and VLUE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

PY has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 1.40% for VLUE.

They also come from different issuers: Principal and iShares.

VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.32 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PY and VLUE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer