PY vs. PQDI
PY (Principal Value ETF) and PQDI (Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Principal, while PQDI is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA 7% Constrained DRD Eligible Preferred Securities Index. PY is actively managed, while PQDI is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PY returned 7.32%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for PQDI. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PQDI.
Performance
PY vs. PQDI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PY achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly higher than PQDI's 1.19% return.
PY
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 4.52%
- 1Y
- 14.24%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
PQDI
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 7.12%
- 3Y*
- 9.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- —
PY vs. PQDI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PY Principal Value ETF | 4.14% | 7.74% | 16.79% | 9.11% | -5.10% | 34.83% | 23.01% |
PQDI Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF | 1.19% | 8.46% | 9.99% | 6.24% | -9.61% | 3.10% | 9.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between PY and PQDI is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020 | 0.43 |
The correlation between PY and PQDI shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PY vs. PQDI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PY
PQDI
Technology
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
PY
PQDI
-
Financial Services
PY
PQDI
Healthcare
PY
PQDI
-
Consumer Defensive
PY
PQDI
-
Consumer Cyclical
PY
PQDI
-
Industrials
PY
PQDI
-
Energy
PY
PQDI
-
Communication Services
PY
PQDI
Utilities
PY
PQDI
-
Basic Materials
PY
PQDI
-
Real Estate
PY
PQDI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PY vs. PQDI — Risk / Return Rank
PY
PQDI
PY vs. PQDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Value ETF (PY) and Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PY | PQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.48 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 2.16 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.73 | 9.67 | -1.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PY | PQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 2.22 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.69 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.03 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
PY vs. PQDI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PY drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than PQDI's maximum drawdown of -17.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PY and PQDI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PY | PQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.44% | -17.41% | -28.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.20% | -3.31% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.84% | -3.31% | -14.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.84% | -17.41% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -0.63% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -3.51% | -1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 0.74% | +1.11% |
Volatility
PY vs. PQDI - Volatility Comparison
Principal Value ETF (PY) has a higher volatility of 2.28% compared to Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) at 1.07%. This indicates that PY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PY | PQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.28% | 1.07% | +1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.28% | 2.81% | +4.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.53% | 3.22% | +7.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 4.69% | +11.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 4.55% | +15.52% |
PY vs. PQDI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PQDI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PY vs. PQDI - Dividend Comparison
PY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than PQDI's 5.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQDI Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF | 5.46% | 5.02% | 4.93% | 5.35% | 5.60% | 5.21% | 2.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PY Principal Value ETF | 2.13% | 2.14% | 2.22% | 2.68% | 3.02% | 2.83% | 2.95% | 2.25% | 2.34% | 1.68% | 1.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PY and PQDI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PY has higher volatility (2.28%) compared to PQDI (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PY dropped -45.44% vs PQDI's -17.41%.
On 5-year performance, PY leads with 7.32% vs 3.23% for PQDI. On fees, PY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PQDI has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PY has performed better with a 7.32% return vs 3.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PQDI.
PQDI has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 2.13% for PY.
PY is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while PQDI is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PY and 0.60% for PQDI.
PQDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PY and PQDI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer