PQDI vs. HIDV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

PQDI (Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF) and HIDV (AB US High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PQDI is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA 7% Constrained DRD Eligible Preferred Securities Index, while HIDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. PQDI is passively managed, while HIDV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PQDI returned 9.11%/yr vs 22.40%/yr for HIDV. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PQDI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HIDV.

Performance

PQDI vs. HIDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) and AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQDI achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than HIDV's 12.02% return.

PQDI

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 1.32%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 7.46%
• 3Y*: 9.11%
• 5Y*: 3.30%
• 10Y*: —

HIDV

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 5.04%
• YTD: 12.02%
• 6M: 13.18%
• 1Y: 30.70%
• 3Y*: 22.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQDI vs. HIDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PQDI Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF	1.32%	8.46%	9.99%	11.19%
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF	12.02%	14.64%	26.01%	22.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PQDI and HIDV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2023	0.57

The correlation between PQDI and HIDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (3 years) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PQDI vs. HIDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQDI

PQDI Risk / Return Rank: 65
PQDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
PQDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
PQDI Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PQDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
PQDI Martin Ratio Rank: 56

HIDV

HIDV Risk / Return Rank: 74
HIDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
HIDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
HIDV Omega Ratio Rank: 78
HIDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
HIDV Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQDI vs. HIDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) and AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PQDI	HIDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	2.60	-0.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	3.60	-0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.47	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.23	3.20	-0.97
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.03	13.99	-3.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PQDI vs. HIDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQDI Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the HIDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQDI and HIDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PQDI	HIDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	2.60	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.03	1.65	-0.62

Drawdowns

PQDI vs. HIDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQDI drawdown since its inception was -17.41%, smaller than the maximum HIDV drawdown of -18.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQDI and HIDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	PQDI	HIDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.41%	-18.76%	+1.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.31%	-9.57%	+6.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.31%	-18.76%	+15.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.50%	0.00%	-0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.51%	-2.06%	-1.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.74%	2.19%	-1.45%

Volatility

PQDI vs. HIDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) is 1.16%, while AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that PQDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PQDI	HIDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	2.91%	-1.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.81%	8.98%	-6.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.22%	11.87%	-8.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.69%	14.51%	-9.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.56%	14.51%	-9.95%

PQDI vs. HIDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQDI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HIDV's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

PQDI vs. HIDV - Dividend Comparison

PQDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than HIDV's 2.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF	2.24%	2.22%	2.29%	2.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PQDI Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF	5.46%	5.02%	4.93%	5.35%	5.60%	5.21%	2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PQDI and HIDV in my portfolio?

PQDI and HIDV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PQDI or HIDV?

HIDV has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to PQDI (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQDI dropped -17.41% vs HIDV's -18.76%.

Which ETF is better, PQDI or HIDV?

On 3-year performance, HIDV leads with 22.40% vs 9.11% for PQDI. On fees, HIDV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PQDI has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PQDI or HIDV?

Over the 3-year period, HIDV has performed better with a 22.40% return vs 9.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PQDI or HIDV?

HIDV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PQDI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PQDI or HIDV?

PQDI has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 2.24% for HIDV.

What is the main difference between PQDI and HIDV?

PQDI is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while HIDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Principal and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PQDI and 0.45% for HIDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HIDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.