PXQ vs. IGV
PXQ (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) and IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET) are both Technology Equities funds - PXQ tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index while IGV tracks the S&P North American Technology-Software Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXQ returned 21.50%/yr vs 17.41%/yr for IGV. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PXQ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IGV.
Performance
PXQ vs. IGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXQ achieves a 64.46% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -0.91% return. Over the past 10 years, PXQ has outperformed IGV with an annualized return of 21.50%, while IGV has yielded a comparatively lower 17.41% annualized return.
PXQ
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- 27.63%
- YTD
- 64.46%
- 6M
- 64.45%
- 1Y
- 102.54%
- 3Y*
- 43.66%
- 5Y*
- 22.20%
- 10Y*
- 21.50%
IGV
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- 20.89%
- YTD
- -0.91%
- 6M
- -0.47%
- 1Y
- 0.76%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 8.21%
- 10Y*
- 17.41%
PXQ vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 64.46% | 28.65% | 19.41% | 27.39% | -29.54% | 21.83% | 39.14% | 26.35% | 5.78% | 15.41% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | -0.91% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXQ and IGV is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2005 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PXQ and IGV has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PXQ vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXQ
IGV
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
PXQ
IGV
Communication Services
PXQ
IGV
Real Estate
PXQ
IGV
-
Industrials
PXQ
IGV
Financial Services
PXQ
IGV
Basic Materials
PXQ
-
IGV
-
Consumer Cyclical
PXQ
-
IGV
Consumer Defensive
PXQ
-
IGV
-
Energy
PXQ
-
IGV
-
Healthcare
PXQ
-
IGV
-
Utilities
PXQ
-
IGV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXQ vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank
PXQ
IGV
PXQ vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXQ | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.85 | 0.03 | +4.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.85 | 0.23 | +5.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | 1.03 | +0.75 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.32 | 0.03 | +10.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 45.42 | 0.06 | +45.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXQ | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.85 | 0.03 | +4.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.30 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | 0.66 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.37 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
PXQ vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXQ drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXQ and IGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXQ | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.18% | -63.45% | +6.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.99% | -36.61% | +26.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.40% | -36.61% | +15.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.55% | -45.85% | +11.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.55% | -45.85% | +11.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -11.09% | +11.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.74% | -14.44% | +3.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 17.20% | -14.93% |
Volatility
PXQ vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) is 9.05%, while iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that PXQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXQ | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.05% | 10.44% | -1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.13% | 23.98% | -6.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.27% | 27.27% | -6.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.19% | 27.79% | -4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 26.31% | -3.34% |
PXQ vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXQ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IGV's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXQ vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison
PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, while IGV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 0.57% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.60% | 2.24% | 0.55% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 1.22% | 0.66% | 0.44% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXQ and IGV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to PXQ (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXQ dropped -57.18% vs IGV's -63.45%.
On 10-year performance, PXQ leads with 21.50% vs 17.41% for IGV. On fees, PXQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, PXQ has been the lower-risk option at 9.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PXQ has performed better with a 21.50% return vs 17.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PXQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IGV.
PXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for IGV.
PXQ tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while IGV tracks S&P North American Technology-Software Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for PXQ and 0.46% for IGV.
PXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.85 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXQ and IGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer