PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXJ vs. XOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXJ vs. XOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXJ achieves a 42.12% return, which is significantly higher than XOP's 23.89% return. Over the past 10 years, PXJ has underperformed XOP with an annualized return of -1.36%, while XOP has yielded a comparatively higher 3.09% annualized return.


PXJ

1D
0.11%
1M
-8.62%
YTD
42.12%
6M
42.80%
1Y
74.07%
3Y*
24.32%
5Y*
17.58%
10Y*
-1.36%

XOP

1D
0.09%
1M
-9.39%
YTD
23.89%
6M
23.68%
1Y
23.02%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
3.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXJ vs. XOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXJ
Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF
42.12%8.74%0.21%14.44%62.25%11.28%-44.31%-0.32%-39.82%-23.08%
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
23.89%-2.15%-1.00%3.56%45.37%66.74%-36.40%-9.44%-28.10%-9.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PXJ and XOP is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between PXJ and XOP has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PXJ vs. XOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXJ
XOP

Energy

93.9%
96.8%

Industrials

5.9%

-

Utilities

2.1%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

3.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

PXJ
93.9%
XOP
96.8%

Industrials

PXJ
5.9%
XOP

-

Utilities

PXJ
2.1%
XOP

-

Financial Services

PXJ
0.2%
XOP

-

Basic Materials

PXJ

-

XOP
3.2%

Communication Services

PXJ

-

XOP

-

Consumer Cyclical

PXJ

-

XOP

-

Consumer Defensive

PXJ

-

XOP

-

Healthcare

PXJ

-

XOP

-

Real Estate

PXJ

-

XOP

-

Technology

PXJ

-

XOP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXJ vs. XOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXJ
PXJ Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

XOP
XOP Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOP Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
XOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOP Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXJ vs. XOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXJXOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.15

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.79

1.25

+4.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.22

3.50

+15.72

PXJ vs. XOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the XOP Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXJ and XOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXJ vs. XOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXJ drawdown since its inception was -94.82%, which is greater than XOP's maximum drawdown of -90.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXJ and XOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXJXOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.82%

-90.27%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-18.50%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.03%

-34.98%

-5.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.03%

-34.98%

-5.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.72%

-82.61%

-5.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.53%

-42.09%

-25.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.69%

-42.58%

-13.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

6.60%

-2.73%

Volatility

PXJ vs. XOP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) have volatilities of 8.62% and 9.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXJXOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.62%

9.01%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.50%

21.96%

-3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.77%

28.30%

-1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.48%

33.88%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.34%

40.25%

-0.91%

PXJ vs. XOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than XOP's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXJ vs. XOP - Dividend Comparison

PXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than XOP's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXJ
Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF
2.46%2.91%3.34%1.99%0.65%2.40%4.72%1.87%0.99%2.75%1.18%2.36%
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
2.10%2.62%2.45%2.63%2.47%1.61%2.34%1.47%0.99%0.76%0.76%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXJ and XOP have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOP has higher volatility (9.01%) compared to PXJ (8.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXJ dropped -94.82% vs XOP's -90.27%.

On 10-year performance, XOP leads with 3.09% vs -1.36% for PXJ. On fees, XOP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PXJ has been the lower-risk option at 8.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XOP has performed better with a 3.09% return vs -1.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XOP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PXJ.

PXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 2.10% for XOP.

PXJ tracks Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index, while XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PXJ and 0.35% for XOP.

PXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXJ and XOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer