PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXJ vs. TPYP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXJ vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXJ achieves a 43.34% return, which is significantly higher than TPYP's 20.31% return. Over the past 10 years, PXJ has underperformed TPYP with an annualized return of -0.54%, while TPYP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.32% annualized return.


PXJ

1D
-2.57%
1M
7.47%
6M
15.14%
YTD
43.34%
1Y
66.74%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
23.26%
10Y*
-0.54%
ALL TIME*
-1.81%

TPYP

1D
-1.47%
1M
0.33%
6M
10.96%
YTD
20.31%
1Y
22.13%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
18.93%
10Y*
11.32%
ALL TIME*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$672.12K$908.13K$1.86M
$2.68M$2.32M$2.66M

PXJ vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXJ
Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF
43.34%8.74%0.21%14.44%62.25%11.28%-44.31%-0.32%-39.82%-23.08%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
20.31%7.59%37.37%10.51%16.09%34.97%-20.99%23.35%-11.13%2.27%

Correlation

The correlation between PXJ and TPYP is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between PXJ and TPYP has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PXJ vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXJ
TPYP

Energy

74.8%
69.6%

Industrials

14.7%
0.1%

Utilities

2.1%
21.2%

Financial Services

0.2%
2.4%

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

PXJ
74.8%
TPYP
69.6%

Industrials

PXJ
14.7%
TPYP
0.1%

Utilities

PXJ
2.1%
TPYP
21.2%

Financial Services

PXJ
0.2%
TPYP
2.4%

Basic Materials

PXJ

-

TPYP
0.1%

Communication Services

PXJ

-

TPYP

-

Consumer Cyclical

PXJ

-

TPYP

-

Consumer Defensive

PXJ

-

TPYP

-

Healthcare

PXJ

-

TPYP

-

Real Estate

PXJ

-

TPYP

-

Technology

PXJ

-

TPYP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXJ vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PXJ
PXJ Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

TPYP
TPYP Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TPYP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPYP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPYP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TPYP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPYP Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PXJ vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXJTPYPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.27

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

3.25

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.88

7.64

+4.24

PXJ vs. TPYP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the TPYP Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXJ and TPYP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXJ vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXJ drawdown since its inception was -94.82%, which is greater than TPYP's maximum drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXJ and TPYP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXJTPYPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.82%

-51.91%

-42.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.39%

-6.84%

-11.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.03%

-13.17%

-26.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.03%

-17.96%

-22.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.72%

-51.91%

-35.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.25%

-5.54%

-61.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.76%

-7.82%

-47.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.65%

2.91%

+2.74%

Volatility

PXJ vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) has a higher volatility of 7.76% compared to Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) at 4.74%. This indicates that PXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXJTPYPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

4.74%

+3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.35%

11.18%

+8.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.16%

13.98%

+12.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.06%

17.41%

+16.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.16%

21.90%

+17.26%

PXJ vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXJ vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison

PXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, less than TPYP's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXJ
Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF
2.43%2.91%3.34%1.99%0.65%2.40%4.72%1.87%0.99%2.75%1.18%2.36%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
3.28%3.91%3.95%4.83%4.48%4.86%6.14%4.45%4.58%3.71%3.49%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXJ and TPYP have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXJ has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to TPYP (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXJ dropped -94.82% vs TPYP's -51.91%.

On 10-year performance, TPYP leads with 11.32% vs -0.54% for PXJ. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 11.32% return vs -0.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PXJ.

TPYP has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 2.43% for PXJ.

PXJ tracks Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index, while TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PXJ and 0.40% for TPYP.

PXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXJ and TPYP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer