PXJ vs. LNGX
PXJ (Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF) and LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - PXJ tracks the Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index while LNGX tracks the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PXJ charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LNGX.
Performance
PXJ vs. LNGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXJ achieves a 46.18% return, which is significantly higher than LNGX's 20.47% return.
PXJ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -6.26%
- YTD
- 46.18%
- 6M
- 38.54%
- 1Y
- 82.76%
- 3Y*
- 24.79%
- 5Y*
- 17.27%
- 10Y*
- -0.80%
LNGX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- 20.47%
- 6M
- 13.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PXJ vs. LNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF | 46.18% | -0.95% |
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 20.47% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXJ and LNGX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXJ vs. LNGX — Risk / Return Rank
PXJ
LNGX
PXJ vs. LNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXJ | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.98 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXJ | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 2.10 | -2.14 |
Drawdowns
PXJ vs. LNGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXJ drawdown since its inception was -94.82%, which is greater than LNGX's maximum drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXJ and LNGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXJ | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.82% | -14.31% | -80.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.60% | -11.36% | -55.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.67% | -4.37% | -51.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | — | — |
Volatility
PXJ vs. LNGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXJ | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.41% | 24.67% | +1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.57% | 24.67% | +9.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.47% | 24.67% | +14.80% |
PXJ vs. LNGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than LNGX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXJ vs. LNGX - Dividend Comparison
PXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than LNGX's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF | 2.21% | 2.91% | 3.34% | 1.99% | 0.65% | 2.40% | 4.72% | 1.87% | 0.99% | 2.75% | 1.18% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXJ and LNGX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LNGX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LNGX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PXJ.
PXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 0.22% for LNGX.
PXJ tracks Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index, while LNGX tracks Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PXJ and 0.45% for LNGX.
Find the right allocation for PXJ and LNGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer