PXI vs. JMOM
PXI (Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF) and JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds - PXI tracks the Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index while JMOM tracks the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PXI returned 16.60%/yr vs 16.24%/yr for JMOM. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PXI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JMOM.
Performance
PXI vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXI achieves a 32.39% return, which is significantly higher than JMOM's 22.57% return.
PXI
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- 32.39%
- 6M
- 24.73%
- 1Y
- 46.96%
- 3Y*
- 18.93%
- 5Y*
- 16.60%
- 10Y*
- 5.94%
JMOM
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 22.57%
- 6M
- 21.71%
- 1Y
- 36.34%
- 3Y*
- 28.46%
- 5Y*
- 16.24%
- 10Y*
- —
PXI vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 32.39% | 3.86% | 0.76% | 5.48% | 45.85% | 75.05% | -35.91% | 1.67% | -27.56% | 5.34% |
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 22.57% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXI and JMOM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PXI and JMOM has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PXI vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXI
JMOM
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
PXI
JMOM
Basic Materials
PXI
JMOM
Industrials
PXI
JMOM
Communication Services
PXI
-
JMOM
Consumer Cyclical
PXI
-
JMOM
Consumer Defensive
PXI
-
JMOM
Financial Services
PXI
-
JMOM
Healthcare
PXI
-
JMOM
Real Estate
PXI
-
JMOM
Technology
PXI
-
JMOM
Utilities
PXI
-
JMOM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXI vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank
PXI
JMOM
PXI vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXI | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.45 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.36 | 4.64 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.35 | 21.99 | -8.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXI | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 2.55 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.87 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.82 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
PXI vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXI drawdown since its inception was -85.08%, which is greater than JMOM's maximum drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXI and JMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXI | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.08% | -34.31% | -50.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.83% | -7.87% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.74% | -19.51% | -11.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.47% | -28.26% | -5.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.55% | -0.35% | -3.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.43% | -6.31% | -23.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 1.66% | +1.87% |
Volatility
PXI vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) at 4.56%. This indicates that PXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXI | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.81% | 4.56% | +3.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.32% | 11.56% | +4.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.36% | 14.31% | +7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.47% | 18.65% | +14.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.18% | 20.13% | +17.05% |
PXI vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JMOM's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXI vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison
PXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than JMOM's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.72% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 1.28% | 1.81% | 1.52% | 1.82% | 3.14% | 0.57% | 1.72% | 2.80% | 0.93% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXI and JMOM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXI has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to JMOM (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXI dropped -85.08% vs JMOM's -34.31%.
On 5-year performance, PXI leads with 16.60% vs 16.24% for JMOM. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JMOM has been the lower-risk option at 4.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PXI has performed better with a 16.60% return vs 16.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PXI.
PXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.72% for JMOM.
PXI tracks Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index, while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PXI and 0.12% for JMOM.
JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXI and JMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer