PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXI vs. ENFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXI vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXI achieves a 32.32% return, which is significantly higher than ENFR's 28.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PXI has underperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 7.01%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.14% annualized return.


PXI

1D
1.27%
1M
10.04%
6M
18.58%
YTD
32.32%
1Y
43.31%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
20.85%
10Y*
7.01%
ALL TIME*
5.73%

ENFR

1D
0.25%
1M
3.92%
6M
19.23%
YTD
28.27%
1Y
29.02%
3Y*
26.80%
5Y*
21.89%
10Y*
12.14%
ALL TIME*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.27M$3.93M$3.16M
$1.61M$2.88M$1.35M

PXI vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXI
Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF
32.32%3.86%0.76%5.48%45.85%75.05%-35.91%1.67%-27.56%-8.42%
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
28.27%5.88%42.17%15.63%17.48%39.97%-24.14%21.60%-18.67%-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PXI and ENFR is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013

0.77

The correlation between PXI and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXI vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PXI
PXI Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ENFR
ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PXI vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXIENFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

3.33

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.88

8.16

+0.71

PXI vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXI Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXI and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXI vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXI drawdown since its inception was -85.08%, which is greater than ENFR's maximum drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXI and ENFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXIENFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.08%

-68.28%

-16.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.40%

-8.64%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.74%

-15.58%

-15.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.47%

-20.29%

-13.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.55%

-62.64%

-16.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.60%

-2.57%

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.25%

-15.83%

-13.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.54%

3.52%

+1.02%

Volatility

PXI vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) has a higher volatility of 7.05% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 5.44%. This indicates that PXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXIENFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.05%

5.44%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.89%

12.30%

+5.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.49%

15.24%

+7.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.81%

19.19%

+13.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.94%

24.65%

+12.29%

PXI vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXI vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

PXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than ENFR's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
3.91%4.77%4.41%5.48%5.23%7.86%7.57%5.81%3.98%2.98%3.31%3.34%
PXI
Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF
1.24%1.81%1.52%1.82%3.14%0.57%1.72%2.80%0.93%0.80%0.73%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXI and ENFR have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXI has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to ENFR (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXI dropped -85.08% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

On 10-year performance, ENFR leads with 12.14% vs 7.01% for PXI. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ENFR has been the lower-risk option at 5.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 12.14% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PXI.

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 1.24% for PXI.

PXI is categorized as Momentum, while ENFR is Infrastructure Equities. PXI tracks Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PXI and 0.35% for ENFR.

ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXI and ENFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer