PXH vs. XLG

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PXH (Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXH is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXH returned 9.29%/yr vs 16.44%/yr for XLG. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PXH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

PXH vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXH achieves a 14.44% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 4.68% return. Over the past 10 years, PXH has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 9.29%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.44% annualized return.

PXH

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 5.02%
• 6M: 7.06%
• YTD: 14.44%
• 1Y: 29.71%
• 3Y*: 20.27%
• 5Y*: 10.24%
• 10Y*: 9.29%
• ALL TIME*: 3.68%

XLG

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: 1.81%
• 6M: 4.68%
• YTD: 4.68%
• 1Y: 17.86%
• 3Y*: 21.61%
• 5Y*: 14.02%
• 10Y*: 16.44%
• ALL TIME*: 11.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF	$5.43M	$7.06M	$7.27M
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	$59.56M	$59.06M	$102.51M

PXH vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF	14.44%	31.44%	12.09%	13.93%	-15.18%	8.31%	-1.91%	16.77%	-8.68%	26.60%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	4.68%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between PXH and XLG is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007	0.66

The correlation between PXH and XLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PXH vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PXH	XLG
Financial Services	26.1%	10.3%
Technology	24.3%	49.8%
Basic Materials	10.9%	0.6%
Energy	10.8%	2.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	9.3%
Communication Services	6.2%	13.0%
Industrials	4.6%	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	5.1%
Utilities	2.2%	0.7%
Real Estate	1.5%	-
Healthcare	0.9%	6.8%

Return for Risk

PXH vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PXH

PXH Risk / Return Rank: 75
PXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
PXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
PXH Omega Ratio Rank: 76
PXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
PXH Martin Ratio Rank: 71

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 45
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 47
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PXH vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PXH	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	1.22	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	1.74	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.22	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	1.44	+1.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.08	4.49	+4.59

PXH vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXH and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PXH vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXH drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXH and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PXH	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.63%	-52.39%	-11.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.24%	-12.41%	+2.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.72%	-20.70%	+2.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.59%	-28.02%	-1.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.42%	-30.46%	-9.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.80%	-4.09%	+2.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.75%	-7.62%	-9.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.28%	3.98%	-0.70%

Volatility

PXH vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) is 4.46%, while Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that PXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PXH	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.46%	5.30%	-0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.39%	11.66%	+1.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.44%	14.73%	+1.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.94%	18.91%	-0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.86%	18.93%	+0.93%

PXH vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

PXH vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

PXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than XLG's 0.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF	4.20%	4.02%	4.43%	4.84%	5.33%	4.69%	2.79%	3.28%	3.30%	2.74%	1.97%	3.44%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.64%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PXH and XLG in my portfolio?

PXH and XLG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PXH or XLG?

XLG has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to PXH (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXH dropped -63.63% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, PXH or XLG?

On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 16.44% vs 9.29% for PXH. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, PXH has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PXH or XLG?

Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 16.44% return vs 9.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PXH or XLG?

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PXH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PXH or XLG?

PXH has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 0.64% for XLG.

What is the main difference between PXH and XLG?

PXH is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PXH and 0.20% for XLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.