PXH vs. VEA
PXH (Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXH is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXH returned 10.91%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for VEA. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PXH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
PXH vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXH achieves a 12.73% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.73% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PXH having a 10.91% annualized return and VEA not far behind at 10.72%.
PXH
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 14.41%
- 1Y
- 29.04%
- 3Y*
- 20.06%
- 5Y*
- 8.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
VEA
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 14.73%
- 6M
- 16.65%
- 1Y
- 29.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
PXH vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 12.73% | 31.44% | 12.09% | 13.93% | -15.18% | 8.31% | -1.91% | 16.77% | -8.68% | 26.60% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 14.73% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXH and VEA is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007 | 0.79 |
The correlation between PXH and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
PXH vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXH
VEA
Financial Services
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Healthcare
Financial Services
PXH
VEA
Technology
PXH
VEA
Energy
PXH
VEA
Basic Materials
PXH
VEA
Consumer Cyclical
PXH
VEA
Communication Services
PXH
VEA
Industrials
PXH
VEA
Consumer Defensive
PXH
VEA
Utilities
PXH
VEA
Real Estate
PXH
VEA
Healthcare
PXH
VEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXH vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
PXH
VEA
PXH vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXH | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.33 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 2.58 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.21 | 9.92 | +0.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXH vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXH drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, roughly equal to the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXH and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXH | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.63% | -60.68% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | -11.63% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.72% | -13.45% | -4.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.59% | -29.71% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.42% | -35.73% | -4.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.27% | -1.06% | -2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.84% | -13.28% | -3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 3.02% | -0.17% |
Volatility
PXH vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) is 6.41%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that PXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXH | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 6.84% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.09% | 14.38% | -1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 16.58% | -0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 16.72% | +1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.06% | 17.40% | +2.66% |
PXH vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXH vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
PXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than VEA's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.49% | 4.02% | 4.43% | 4.84% | 5.33% | 4.69% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 3.30% | 2.74% | 1.97% | 3.44% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXH and VEA have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEA has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to PXH (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXH dropped -63.63% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 10-year performance, PXH leads with 10.91% vs 10.72% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, PXH has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PXH has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PXH.
PXH has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.62% for VEA.
PXH is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PXH and 0.03% for VEA.
PXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXH and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer