PXH vs. SCZ
PXH (Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF) and SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXH is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while SCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXH returned 10.99%/yr vs 8.11%/yr for SCZ. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PXH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SCZ.
Performance
PXH vs. SCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXH achieves a 16.54% return, which is significantly higher than SCZ's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, PXH has outperformed SCZ with an annualized return of 10.99%, while SCZ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.11% annualized return.
PXH
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 4.79%
- YTD
- 16.54%
- 6M
- 17.48%
- 1Y
- 39.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
SCZ
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 23.89%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.41%
- 10Y*
- 8.11%
PXH vs. SCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 16.54% | 31.44% | 12.09% | 13.93% | -15.18% | 8.31% | -1.91% | 16.77% | -8.68% | 26.60% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 10.36% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 12.98% | -21.27% | 10.12% | 11.71% | 24.68% | -17.64% | 32.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXH and SCZ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007 | 0.74 |
The correlation between PXH and SCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
PXH vs. SCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXH
SCZ
Financial Services
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Healthcare
Financial Services
PXH
SCZ
Technology
PXH
SCZ
Energy
PXH
SCZ
Basic Materials
PXH
SCZ
Consumer Cyclical
PXH
SCZ
Communication Services
PXH
SCZ
Industrials
PXH
SCZ
Consumer Defensive
PXH
SCZ
Utilities
PXH
SCZ
Real Estate
PXH
SCZ
Healthcare
PXH
SCZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXH vs. SCZ — Risk / Return Rank
PXH
SCZ
PXH vs. SCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXH | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.61 | 1.66 | +0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.47 | 2.38 | +1.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.30 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 2.22 | +1.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.79 | 8.51 | +6.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXH | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 1.66 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.32 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.47 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.27 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
PXH vs. SCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXH drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, roughly equal to the maximum SCZ drawdown of -61.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXH and SCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXH | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.63% | -61.86% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | -11.43% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.72% | -15.06% | -2.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.59% | -36.87% | +7.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.42% | -41.07% | +0.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.08% | +1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.87% | -13.07% | -3.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 2.98% | -0.23% |
Volatility
PXH vs. SCZ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) at 4.60%. This indicates that PXH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXH | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 4.60% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.17% | 11.95% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 14.48% | +0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 16.74% | +1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 17.43% | +2.64% |
PXH vs. SCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCZ's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXH vs. SCZ - Dividend Comparison
PXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than SCZ's 2.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.38% | 4.02% | 4.43% | 4.84% | 5.33% | 4.69% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 3.30% | 2.74% | 1.97% | 3.44% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 2.99% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXH and SCZ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXH has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to SCZ (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXH dropped -63.63% vs SCZ's -61.86%.
On 10-year performance, PXH leads with 10.99% vs 8.11% for SCZ. On fees, SCZ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SCZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PXH has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 8.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCZ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PXH.
PXH has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 2.99% for SCZ.
PXH is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SCZ is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PXH and 0.40% for SCZ.
PXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXH and SCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer