PXH vs. PRFZ
PXH (Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF) and PRFZ (Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXH is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while PRFZ is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXH returned 10.91%/yr vs 11.95%/yr for PRFZ. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PXH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PRFZ.
Performance
PXH vs. PRFZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXH achieves a 12.73% return, which is significantly lower than PRFZ's 15.55% return. Over the past 10 years, PXH has underperformed PRFZ with an annualized return of 10.91%, while PRFZ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.95% annualized return.
PXH
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 14.41%
- 1Y
- 29.04%
- 3Y*
- 20.06%
- 5Y*
- 8.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
PRFZ
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 15.55%
- 6M
- 12.59%
- 1Y
- 33.05%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
PXH vs. PRFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 12.73% | 31.44% | 12.09% | 13.93% | -15.18% | 8.31% | -1.91% | 16.77% | -8.68% | 26.60% |
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 15.55% | 11.26% | 12.68% | 20.21% | -16.29% | 28.26% | 11.84% | 21.91% | -11.43% | 13.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXH and PRFZ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007 | 0.66 |
The correlation between PXH and PRFZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
PXH vs. PRFZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXH
PRFZ
Financial Services
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Healthcare
Financial Services
PXH
PRFZ
Technology
PXH
PRFZ
Energy
PXH
PRFZ
Basic Materials
PXH
PRFZ
Consumer Cyclical
PXH
PRFZ
Communication Services
PXH
PRFZ
Industrials
PXH
PRFZ
Consumer Defensive
PXH
PRFZ
Utilities
PXH
PRFZ
Real Estate
PXH
PRFZ
Healthcare
PXH
PRFZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXH vs. PRFZ — Risk / Return Rank
PXH
PRFZ
PXH vs. PRFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXH | PRFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.31 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 3.20 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.21 | 11.02 | -0.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXH vs. PRFZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXH drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, roughly equal to the maximum PRFZ drawdown of -62.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXH and PRFZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXH | PRFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.63% | -62.41% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | -10.38% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.72% | -26.54% | +8.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.59% | -26.58% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.42% | -44.28% | +3.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.27% | 0.00% | -3.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.84% | -9.41% | -7.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 3.01% | -0.16% |
Volatility
PXH vs. PRFZ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) at 5.92%. This indicates that PXH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRFZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXH | PRFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 5.92% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.09% | 12.93% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 18.33% | -2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 21.38% | -3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.06% | 22.46% | -2.40% |
PXH vs. PRFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PRFZ's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXH vs. PRFZ - Dividend Comparison
PXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than PRFZ's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 0.82% | 0.82% | 1.45% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.93% | 0.91% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 0.97% | 1.31% | 1.39% |
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.49% | 4.02% | 4.43% | 4.84% | 5.33% | 4.69% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 3.30% | 2.74% | 1.97% | 3.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXH and PRFZ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXH has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to PRFZ (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXH dropped -63.63% vs PRFZ's -62.41%.
On 10-year performance, PRFZ leads with 11.95% vs 10.91% for PXH. On fees, PRFZ is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, PRFZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PRFZ has performed better with a 11.95% return vs 10.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PRFZ is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PXH.
PXH has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.82% for PRFZ.
PXH is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PRFZ is Small Cap Blend Equities. PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while PRFZ tracks FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PXH and 0.39% for PRFZ.
PXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXH and PRFZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer