PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXF vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXF vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXF achieves a 21.27% return, which is significantly higher than SPHQ's 15.16% return. Over the past 10 years, PXF has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 11.88%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 14.98% annualized return.


PXF

1D
0.62%
1M
6.53%
YTD
21.27%
6M
25.96%
1Y
44.09%
3Y*
25.42%
5Y*
13.78%
10Y*
11.88%

SPHQ

1D
1.26%
1M
6.56%
YTD
15.16%
6M
16.32%
1Y
23.61%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
14.73%
10Y*
14.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXF vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
21.27%42.51%4.54%18.46%-9.09%15.93%2.58%17.50%-14.84%24.52%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
15.16%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PXF and SPHQ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2007

0.72

The correlation between PXF and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

PXF vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXF
SPHQ

Financial Services

19.7%
13.3%

Industrials

15.1%
24.3%

Technology

11.4%
28.1%

Energy

10.6%
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
4.6%

Basic Materials

10.1%
2.2%

Healthcare

7.2%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
15.4%

Communication Services

4.3%
2.0%

Utilities

3.6%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Financial Services

PXF
19.7%
SPHQ
13.3%

Industrials

PXF
15.1%
SPHQ
24.3%

Technology

PXF
11.4%
SPHQ
28.1%

Energy

PXF
10.6%
SPHQ
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PXF
10.2%
SPHQ
4.6%

Basic Materials

PXF
10.1%
SPHQ
2.2%

Healthcare

PXF
7.2%
SPHQ
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

PXF
6.1%
SPHQ
15.4%

Communication Services

PXF
4.3%
SPHQ
2.0%

Utilities

PXF
3.6%
SPHQ
1.0%

Real Estate

PXF
1.8%
SPHQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXF vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXF
PXF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXF Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXF vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXFSPHQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.91

1.88

+1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.82

2.73

+1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.32

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

2.70

+1.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.08

11.50

+4.57

PXF vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is higher than the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXF and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXFSPHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

1.88

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.90

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.84

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.53

-0.29

Drawdowns

PXF vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXF drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than SPHQ's maximum drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXF and SPHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXFSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.74%

-57.83%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.91%

-8.90%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.06%

-16.57%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

-25.04%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.59%

-31.60%

-9.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.28%

-10.70%

-4.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.08%

+0.76%

Volatility

PXF vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 3.55%. This indicates that PXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXFSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

3.55%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.84%

10.20%

+2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.24%

12.62%

+2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.45%

16.45%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

17.87%

+0.17%

PXF vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXF vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

PXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than SPHQ's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
3.05%3.64%3.48%3.55%3.58%3.74%2.11%3.50%3.38%2.78%3.21%3.10%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.04%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXF and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXF has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to SPHQ (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXF dropped -64.74% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.98% vs 11.88% for PXF. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.98% return vs 11.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PXF.

PXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 1.04% for SPHQ.

PXF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PXF and 0.15% for SPHQ.

PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXF and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer