PXF vs. QQQM
PXF (Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PXF returned 13.78%/yr vs 18.52%/yr for QQQM. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PXF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
PXF vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PXF having a 21.27% return and QQQM slightly higher at 21.64%.
PXF
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 6.53%
- YTD
- 21.27%
- 6M
- 25.96%
- 1Y
- 44.09%
- 3Y*
- 25.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.88%
QQQM
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 10.70%
- YTD
- 21.64%
- 6M
- 20.29%
- 1Y
- 43.37%
- 3Y*
- 28.98%
- 5Y*
- 18.52%
- 10Y*
- —
PXF vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 21.27% | 42.51% | 4.54% | 18.46% | -9.09% | 15.93% | 17.10% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.64% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXF and QQQM is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.59 |
The correlation between PXF and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
PXF vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXF
QQQM
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
PXF
QQQM
Industrials
PXF
QQQM
Technology
PXF
QQQM
Energy
PXF
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
PXF
QQQM
Basic Materials
PXF
QQQM
Healthcare
PXF
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
PXF
QQQM
Communication Services
PXF
QQQM
Utilities
PXF
QQQM
Real Estate
PXF
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXF vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
PXF
QQQM
PXF vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXF | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.91 | 2.74 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.82 | 3.56 | +0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.47 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.18 | 3.72 | +0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.08 | 14.29 | +1.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXF | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91 | 2.74 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.84 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.85 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
PXF vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXF drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXF and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXF | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.74% | -35.04% | -29.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.91% | -11.96% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.06% | -22.70% | +8.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.82% | -35.04% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.28% | -8.26% | -7.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 3.11% | -0.27% |
Volatility
PXF vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.47%. This indicates that PXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXF | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 4.47% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.84% | 12.06% | +0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.24% | 15.92% | -0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 22.24% | -5.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 22.13% | -4.09% |
PXF vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXF vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
PXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 3.05% | 3.64% | 3.48% | 3.55% | 3.58% | 3.74% | 2.11% | 3.50% | 3.38% | 2.78% | 3.21% | 3.10% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXF and QQQM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXF has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to QQQM (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXF dropped -64.74% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.52% vs 13.78% for PXF. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.52% return vs 13.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PXF.
PXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
PXF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PXF and 0.15% for QQQM.
PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXF and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer