PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXF vs. PFXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXF vs. PFXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXF achieves a 20.42% return, which is significantly higher than PFXF's 8.54% return. Over the past 10 years, PXF has outperformed PFXF with an annualized return of 11.80%, while PFXF has yielded a comparatively lower 5.44% annualized return.


PXF

1D
-0.70%
1M
6.92%
YTD
20.42%
6M
24.34%
1Y
44.15%
3Y*
25.13%
5Y*
13.47%
10Y*
11.80%

PFXF

1D
-0.95%
1M
2.21%
YTD
8.54%
6M
9.54%
1Y
18.28%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
4.48%
10Y*
5.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXF vs. PFXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
20.42%42.51%4.54%18.46%-9.09%15.93%2.58%17.50%-14.84%24.52%
PFXF
VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF
8.54%9.64%8.42%11.20%-18.83%11.61%7.61%20.52%-4.17%7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between PXF and PFXF is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2012

0.56

The correlation between PXF and PFXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

PXF vs. PFXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXF
PFXF

Financial Services

19.7%
6.2%

Industrials

15.1%
1.0%

Technology

11.4%
9.7%

Energy

10.6%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
2.2%

Basic Materials

10.1%

-

Healthcare

7.2%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
2.9%

Communication Services

4.3%
6.7%

Utilities

3.6%
12.4%

Real Estate

1.8%
14.0%

Financial Services

PXF
19.7%
PFXF
6.2%

Industrials

PXF
15.1%
PFXF
1.0%

Technology

PXF
11.4%
PFXF
9.7%

Energy

PXF
10.6%
PFXF
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PXF
10.2%
PFXF
2.2%

Basic Materials

PXF
10.1%
PFXF

-

Healthcare

PXF
7.2%
PFXF
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

PXF
6.1%
PFXF
2.9%

Communication Services

PXF
4.3%
PFXF
6.7%

Utilities

PXF
3.6%
PFXF
12.4%

Real Estate

PXF
1.8%
PFXF
14.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXF vs. PFXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXF
PXF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXF Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXF Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PFXF
PFXF Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PFXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFXF Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PFXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFXF Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXF vs. PFXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXFPFXFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.92

2.06

+0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.83

2.98

+0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.37

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

3.15

+0.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.61

11.08

+4.52

PXF vs. PFXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the PFXF Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXF and PFXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXFPFXFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

2.06

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.41

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.41

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.49

-0.25

Drawdowns

PXF vs. PFXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXF drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than PFXF's maximum drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXF and PFXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXFPFXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.74%

-35.49%

-29.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.91%

-5.83%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.06%

-11.90%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

-21.80%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.59%

-35.49%

-6.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.95%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.27%

-3.91%

-11.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

1.65%

+1.19%

Volatility

PXF vs. PFXF - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) at 3.14%. This indicates that PXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXFPFXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

3.14%

+2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.86%

6.89%

+5.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.24%

8.94%

+6.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.45%

10.91%

+5.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

13.21%

+4.83%

PXF vs. PFXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PFXF's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXF vs. PFXF - Dividend Comparison

PXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than PFXF's 6.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFXF
VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF
6.08%6.72%7.82%7.88%6.74%4.66%5.19%5.35%6.56%5.93%5.81%5.99%
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
3.07%3.64%3.48%3.55%3.58%3.74%2.11%3.50%3.38%2.78%3.21%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXF and PFXF have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXF has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to PFXF (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXF dropped -64.74% vs PFXF's -35.49%.

On 10-year performance, PXF leads with 11.80% vs 5.44% for PFXF. On fees, PFXF is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, PFXF has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PXF has performed better with a 11.80% return vs 5.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFXF is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PXF.

PFXF has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 3.07% for PXF.

PXF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PFXF is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index, while PFXF tracks Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities ex Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PXF and 0.41% for PFXF.

PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXF and PFXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer