PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFXF vs. PFFV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFXF vs. PFFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) and Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFXF achieves a 9.58% return, which is significantly higher than PFFV's 2.97% return.


PFXF

1D
0.32%
1M
2.80%
YTD
9.58%
6M
10.72%
1Y
20.05%
3Y*
10.65%
5Y*
4.77%
10Y*
5.54%

PFFV

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.23%
YTD
2.97%
6M
3.10%
1Y
5.41%
3Y*
7.52%
5Y*
2.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFXF vs. PFFV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PFXF
VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF
9.58%9.64%8.42%11.20%-18.83%11.61%15.63%
PFFV
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
2.97%2.08%9.45%10.64%-13.81%6.35%13.36%

Correlation

The correlation between PFXF and PFFV is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020

0.72

The correlation between PFXF and PFFV shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PFXF vs. PFFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PFXF
PFFV

Real Estate

14.0%
19.6%

Utilities

12.4%

-

Technology

9.7%

-

Communication Services

6.7%

-

Financial Services

6.2%
72.1%

Healthcare

3.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.2%

-

Industrials

1.0%

-

Energy

0.4%
1.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Real Estate

PFXF
14.0%
PFFV
19.6%

Utilities

PFXF
12.4%
PFFV

-

Technology

PFXF
9.7%
PFFV

-

Communication Services

PFXF
6.7%
PFFV

-

Financial Services

PFXF
6.2%
PFFV
72.1%

Healthcare

PFXF
3.0%
PFFV

-

Consumer Defensive

PFXF
2.9%
PFFV

-

Consumer Cyclical

PFXF
2.2%
PFFV

-

Industrials

PFXF
1.0%
PFFV

-

Energy

PFXF
0.4%
PFFV
1.6%

Basic Materials

PFXF

-

PFFV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFXF vs. PFFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFXF
PFXF Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PFXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFXF Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
PFXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFXF Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFV
PFFV Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PFFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFV Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFXF vs. PFFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) and Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFXFPFFVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.27

1.32

+0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.29

1.96

+1.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.24

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

1.60

+1.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.25

4.50

+7.74

PFXF vs. PFFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the PFFV Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFXF and PFFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFXFPFFVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

1.32

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.26

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.56

-0.06

Drawdowns

PFXF vs. PFFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFXF drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, which is greater than PFFV's maximum drawdown of -18.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFXF and PFFV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFXFPFFVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.49%

-18.96%

-16.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.83%

-3.23%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.90%

-6.07%

-5.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.80%

-18.96%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.26%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-4.19%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

1.15%

+0.50%

Volatility

PFXF vs. PFFV - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) at 0.84%. This indicates that PFXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFXFPFFVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

0.84%

+2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.87%

2.84%

+4.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.88%

4.12%

+4.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.90%

8.84%

+2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

8.69%

+4.52%

PFXF vs. PFFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFXF has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFXF vs. PFFV - Dividend Comparison

PFXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, less than PFFV's 8.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFFV
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
8.11%8.26%7.33%7.17%6.60%5.23%2.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFXF
VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF
6.02%6.72%7.82%7.88%6.74%4.66%5.19%5.35%6.56%5.93%5.81%5.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFXF and PFFV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFXF has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to PFFV (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFXF dropped -35.49% vs PFFV's -18.96%.

On 5-year performance, PFXF leads with 4.77% vs 2.28% for PFFV. On fees, PFFV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PFFV has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PFXF has performed better with a 4.77% return vs 2.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFFV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for PFXF.

PFFV has the higher dividend yield at 8.11%, compared with 6.02% for PFXF.

PFXF tracks Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities ex Financials Index, while PFFV tracks ICE U.S. Variable Rate Preferred Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for PFXF and 0.25% for PFFV.

PFXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFXF and PFFV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer