PXF vs. PATN
PXF (Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF) and PATN (Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - PXF tracks the FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index while PATN tracks the Nasdaq International Patent Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PXF returned 44.09% vs 73.81% for PATN. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PXF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PATN.
Performance
PXF vs. PATN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXF achieves a 21.27% return, which is significantly lower than PATN's 41.08% return.
PXF
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 6.53%
- YTD
- 21.27%
- 6M
- 25.96%
- 1Y
- 44.09%
- 3Y*
- 25.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.88%
PATN
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 17.36%
- YTD
- 41.08%
- 6M
- 45.45%
- 1Y
- 73.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PXF vs. PATN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 21.27% | 42.51% | -5.25% |
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF | 41.08% | 40.01% | -1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXF and PATN is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024 | 0.84 |
The correlation between PXF and PATN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
PXF vs. PATN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXF
PATN
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
PXF
PATN
Industrials
PXF
PATN
Technology
PXF
PATN
Energy
PXF
PATN
Consumer Cyclical
PXF
PATN
Basic Materials
PXF
PATN
Healthcare
PXF
PATN
Consumer Defensive
PXF
PATN
Communication Services
PXF
PATN
Utilities
PXF
PATN
-
Real Estate
PXF
PATN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXF vs. PATN — Risk / Return Rank
PXF
PATN
PXF vs. PATN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXF | PATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.91 | 3.51 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.82 | 4.38 | -0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.61 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.18 | 5.26 | -1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.08 | 21.36 | -5.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXF | PATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91 | 3.51 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 2.30 | -2.06 |
Drawdowns
PXF vs. PATN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXF drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than PATN's maximum drawdown of -16.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXF and PATN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXF | PATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.74% | -16.77% | -47.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.91% | -14.40% | +3.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.28% | -3.16% | -12.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 3.55% | -0.71% |
Volatility
PXF vs. PATN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) is 5.41%, while Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) has a volatility of 8.78%. This indicates that PXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PATN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXF | PATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 8.78% | -3.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.84% | 18.15% | -5.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.24% | 21.18% | -5.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 20.87% | -4.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 20.87% | -2.83% |
PXF vs. PATN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PATN's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXF vs. PATN - Dividend Comparison
PXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than PATN's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF | 1.59% | 2.25% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 3.05% | 3.64% | 3.48% | 3.55% | 3.58% | 3.74% | 2.11% | 3.50% | 3.38% | 2.78% | 3.21% | 3.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXF and PATN have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PATN has higher volatility (8.78%) compared to PXF (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXF dropped -64.74% vs PATN's -16.77%.
On 1-year performance, PATN leads with 73.81% vs 44.09% for PXF. On fees, PXF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PXF has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PATN has performed better with a 73.81% return vs 44.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PXF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PATN.
PXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 1.59% for PATN.
PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index, while PATN tracks Nasdaq International Patent Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PXF and 0.65% for PATN.
PATN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 2.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXF and PATN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer