PXF vs. PATN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PXF (Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF) and PATN (Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - PXF tracks the FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index while PATN tracks the Nasdaq International Patent Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PXF returned 38.71% vs 65.39% for PATN. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PXF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PATN.

Performance

PXF vs. PATN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXF achieves a 15.96% return, which is significantly lower than PATN's 34.64% return.

PXF

• 1D: -2.82%
• 1M: -1.23%
• YTD: 15.96%
• 6M: 16.38%
• 1Y: 38.71%
• 3Y*: 23.69%
• 5Y*: 13.10%
• 10Y*: 12.13%

PATN

• 1D: -5.19%
• 1M: 4.01%
• YTD: 34.64%
• 6M: 35.70%
• 1Y: 65.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXF vs. PATN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF	15.96%	42.51%	-5.78%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	34.64%	40.01%	-1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between PXF and PATN is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024	0.84

The correlation between PXF and PATN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

PXF vs. PATN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PXF	PATN
Financial Services	19.1%	0.5%
Technology	14.7%	52.5%
Industrials	14.6%	14.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	7.0%
Basic Materials	10.1%	2.4%
Energy	9.5%	2.1%
Healthcare	6.8%	9.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.7%	5.2%
Communication Services	4.3%	6.1%
Utilities	3.2%	-
Real Estate	1.6%	-

Return for Risk

PXF vs. PATN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXF

PXF Risk / Return Rank: 75
PXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
PXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
PXF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
PXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
PXF Martin Ratio Rank: 74

PATN

PATN Risk / Return Rank: 87
PATN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PATN Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
PATN Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PATN Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PATN Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXF vs. PATN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PXF	PATN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	2.75	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.10	3.37	-0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.49	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.56	4.56	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.32	17.76	-4.44

PXF vs. PATN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the PATN Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXF and PATN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PXF vs. PATN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXF drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than PATN's maximum drawdown of -16.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXF and PATN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PXF	PATN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.74%	-16.77%	-47.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.91%	-14.40%	+3.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.37%	-5.19%	+0.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.24%	-3.17%	-12.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	3.69%	-0.77%

Volatility

PXF vs. PATN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) is 6.95%, while Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) has a volatility of 12.88%. This indicates that PXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PATN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PXF	PATN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.95%	12.88%	-5.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.28%	21.37%	-7.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.41%	23.92%	-7.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.64%	22.26%	-5.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.81%	22.26%	-4.45%

PXF vs. PATN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PATN's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

PXF vs. PATN - Dividend Comparison

PXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than PATN's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	1.61%	2.25%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF	3.17%	3.64%	3.48%	3.55%	3.58%	3.74%	2.11%	3.50%	3.38%	2.78%	3.21%	3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PXF and PATN in my portfolio?

PXF and PATN have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PXF or PATN?

PATN has higher volatility (12.88%) compared to PXF (6.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXF dropped -64.74% vs PATN's -16.77%.

Which ETF is better, PXF or PATN?

On 1-year performance, PATN leads with 65.39% vs 38.71% for PXF. On fees, PXF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PXF has been the lower-risk option at 6.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PXF or PATN?

Over the 1-year period, PATN has performed better with a 65.39% return vs 38.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PXF or PATN?

PXF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PATN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PXF or PATN?

PXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 1.61% for PATN.

What is the main difference between PXF and PATN?

PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index, while PATN tracks Nasdaq International Patent Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PXF and 0.65% for PATN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PATN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.