PATN vs. IDEV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PATN (Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF) and IDEV (iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - PATN tracks the Nasdaq International Patent Leaders Index while IDEV tracks the MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PATN returned 75.77% vs 26.25% for IDEV. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PATN charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IDEV.

Performance

PATN vs. IDEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PATN achieves a 42.01% return, which is significantly higher than IDEV's 10.38% return.

PATN

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 9.70%
• YTD: 42.01%
• 6M: 43.79%
• 1Y: 75.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IDEV

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: 10.38%
• 6M: 10.58%
• 1Y: 26.25%
• 3Y*: 18.20%
• 5Y*: 9.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PATN vs. IDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	42.01%	40.01%	-1.73%
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF	10.38%	32.56%	-5.94%

Correlation

The correlation between PATN and IDEV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024	0.84

The correlation between PATN and IDEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

PATN vs. IDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PATN	IDEV
Technology	52.5%	11.1%
Industrials	14.8%	18.8%
Healthcare	9.4%	8.5%
Consumer Cyclical	7.0%	7.7%
Communication Services	6.1%	4.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	5.8%
Basic Materials	2.4%	8.3%
Energy	2.1%	5.4%
Financial Services	0.5%	24.0%
Real Estate	-	2.7%
Utilities	-	3.4%

Return for Risk

PATN vs. IDEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PATN

PATN Risk / Return Rank: 91
PATN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
PATN Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PATN Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PATN Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PATN Martin Ratio Rank: 91

IDEV

IDEV Risk / Return Rank: 52
IDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
IDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
IDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 52
IDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
IDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PATN vs. IDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PATN	IDEV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.27	1.76	+1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.97	2.48	+1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.32	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.29	2.35	+2.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.66	9.21	+11.45

PATN vs. IDEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PATN Sharpe Ratio is 3.27, which is higher than the IDEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PATN and IDEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PATN vs. IDEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PATN drawdown since its inception was -16.77%, smaller than the maximum IDEV drawdown of -34.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATN and IDEV.

Drawdown Indicators

	PATN	IDEV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.77%	-34.77%	+18.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.40%	-11.20%	-3.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.41%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.13%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.16%	-6.53%	+3.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.68%	2.86%	+0.82%

Volatility

PATN vs. IDEV - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) has a higher volatility of 11.59% compared to iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) at 4.70%. This indicates that PATN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PATN	IDEV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.59%	4.70%	+6.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.64%	12.69%	+7.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.34%	14.97%	+8.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.92%	16.33%	+5.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.92%	17.28%	+4.64%

PATN vs. IDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PATN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IDEV's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

PATN vs. IDEV - Dividend Comparison

PATN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than IDEV's 3.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF	3.20%	3.40%	3.30%	3.07%	2.69%	3.05%	2.00%	3.18%	3.16%	1.54%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	1.53%	2.25%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PATN and IDEV in my portfolio?

PATN and IDEV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PATN or IDEV?

PATN has higher volatility (11.59%) compared to IDEV (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PATN dropped -16.77% vs IDEV's -34.77%.

Which ETF is better, PATN or IDEV?

On 1-year performance, PATN leads with 75.77% vs 26.25% for IDEV. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IDEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PATN or IDEV?

Over the 1-year period, PATN has performed better with a 75.77% return vs 26.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PATN or IDEV?

IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PATN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PATN or IDEV?

IDEV has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 1.53% for PATN.

What is the main difference between PATN and IDEV?

PATN tracks Nasdaq International Patent Leaders Index, while IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for PATN and 0.05% for IDEV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PATN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.