PATN vs. IPOS

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PATN (Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF) and IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - PATN tracks the Nasdaq International Patent Leaders Index while IPOS tracks the Renaissance International IPO Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PATN returned 75.77% vs 87.31% for IPOS. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PATN charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for IPOS.

Performance

PATN vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PATN achieves a 42.01% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 55.22% return.

PATN

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 9.70%
• YTD: 42.01%
• 6M: 43.79%
• 1Y: 75.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPOS

• 1D: 1.85%
• 1M: 21.21%
• YTD: 55.22%
• 6M: 53.61%
• 1Y: 87.31%
• 3Y*: 21.89%
• 5Y*: -5.55%
• 10Y*: 4.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PATN vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	42.01%	40.01%	-1.73%
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF	55.22%	39.93%	-6.01%

Correlation

The correlation between PATN and IPOS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024	0.62

The correlation between PATN and IPOS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

PATN vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PATN	IPOS
Technology	52.5%	50.2%
Industrials	14.8%	13.4%
Healthcare	9.4%	14.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.0%	6.3%
Communication Services	6.1%	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	4.2%
Basic Materials	2.4%	3.8%
Energy	2.1%	4.9%
Financial Services	0.5%	7.3%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	3.1%

Return for Risk

PATN vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PATN

PATN Risk / Return Rank: 91
PATN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
PATN Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PATN Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PATN Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PATN Martin Ratio Rank: 91

IPOS

IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 83
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 83
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PATN vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PATN	IPOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.27	2.73	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.97	3.24	+0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.47	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.29	5.11	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.66	15.32	+5.34

PATN vs. IPOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PATN Sharpe Ratio is 3.27, which is comparable to the IPOS Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PATN and IPOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PATN vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PATN drawdown since its inception was -16.77%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATN and IPOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	PATN	IPOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.77%	-73.09%	+56.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.40%	-17.17%	+2.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.08%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-69.93%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-73.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-34.04%	+34.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.16%	-32.01%	+28.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.68%	5.72%	-2.04%

Volatility

PATN vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) is 11.59%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 14.82%. This indicates that PATN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PATN	IPOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.59%	14.82%	-3.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.64%	29.53%	-8.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.34%	32.20%	-8.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.92%	27.87%	-5.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.92%	24.42%	-2.50%

PATN vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PATN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

PATN vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison

PATN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than IPOS's 0.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF	0.30%	1.04%	0.93%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.25%	0.89%	1.12%	0.87%	1.73%	1.08%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	1.53%	2.25%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PATN and IPOS in my portfolio?

PATN and IPOS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PATN or IPOS?

IPOS has higher volatility (14.82%) compared to PATN (11.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PATN dropped -16.77% vs IPOS's -73.09%.

Which ETF is better, PATN or IPOS?

On 1-year performance, IPOS leads with 87.31% vs 75.77% for PATN. On fees, PATN is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, PATN has been the lower-risk option at 11.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PATN or IPOS?

Over the 1-year period, IPOS has performed better with a 87.31% return vs 75.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PATN or IPOS?

PATN is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PATN or IPOS?

PATN has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.30% for IPOS.

What is the main difference between PATN and IPOS?

PATN tracks Nasdaq International Patent Leaders Index, while IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for PATN and 0.80% for IPOS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PATN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.