PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXF vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXF vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXF achieves a 18.79% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 23.59% return. Over the past 10 years, PXF has underperformed GRID with an annualized return of 12.26%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively higher 19.76% annualized return.


PXF

1D
0.34%
1M
0.69%
YTD
18.79%
6M
20.98%
1Y
41.20%
3Y*
23.81%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
12.26%

GRID

1D
-0.18%
1M
-4.22%
YTD
23.59%
6M
24.02%
1Y
43.17%
3Y*
23.21%
5Y*
16.83%
10Y*
19.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXF vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
18.79%42.51%4.54%18.46%-9.09%15.93%2.58%17.50%-14.84%24.52%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
23.59%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between PXF and GRID is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009

0.72

The correlation between PXF and GRID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

PXF vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXF
GRID

Financial Services

19.1%

-

Technology

14.7%
12.6%

Industrials

14.6%
24.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
2.4%

Basic Materials

10.1%
0.0%

Energy

9.5%
1.6%

Healthcare

6.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.7%

-

Communication Services

4.3%

-

Utilities

3.2%
3.9%

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Financial Services

PXF
19.1%
GRID

-

Technology

PXF
14.7%
GRID
12.6%

Industrials

PXF
14.6%
GRID
24.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PXF
10.4%
GRID
2.4%

Basic Materials

PXF
10.1%
GRID
0.0%

Energy

PXF
9.5%
GRID
1.6%

Healthcare

PXF
6.8%
GRID

-

Consumer Defensive

PXF
5.7%
GRID

-

Communication Services

PXF
4.3%
GRID

-

Utilities

PXF
3.2%
GRID
3.9%

Real Estate

PXF
1.6%
GRID

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXF vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXF
PXF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXF Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXF vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXFGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.35

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

3.57

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.76

12.89

+0.86

PXF vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXF and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXF vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXF drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than GRID's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXF and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXFGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.74%

-40.56%

-24.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.91%

-11.73%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.06%

-20.77%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

-29.64%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.59%

-40.56%

-1.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.04%

-5.40%

+3.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.25%

-8.42%

-6.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

3.25%

-0.35%

Volatility

PXF vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) is 6.76%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 9.56%. This indicates that PXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXFGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

9.56%

-2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.95%

17.70%

-3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.18%

20.73%

-4.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.62%

21.24%

-4.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.07%

22.90%

-4.83%

PXF vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXF vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

PXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than GRID's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.80%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
3.12%3.64%3.48%3.55%3.58%3.74%2.11%3.50%3.38%2.78%3.21%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXF and GRID have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (9.56%) compared to PXF (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXF dropped -64.74% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 19.76% vs 12.26% for PXF. On fees, PXF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PXF has been the lower-risk option at 6.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 19.76% return vs 12.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PXF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

PXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 0.80% for GRID.

PXF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PXF and 0.70% for GRID.

PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXF and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer