PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRID vs. QCLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GRID vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GRID vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRID
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index
9.08%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
5.17%31.81%-18.86%-10.02%-30.37%-3.21%184.00%42.65%-12.38%32.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRID achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly higher than QCLN's 5.17% return. Over the past 10 years, GRID has outperformed QCLN with an annualized return of 18.31%, while QCLN has yielded a comparatively lower 12.87% annualized return.


GRID

1D
1.98%
1M
-5.47%
YTD
9.08%
6M
9.98%
1Y
48.00%
3Y*
20.91%
5Y*
15.14%
10Y*
18.31%

QCLN

1D
0.90%
1M
-4.61%
YTD
5.17%
6M
8.63%
1Y
61.08%
3Y*
-2.97%
5Y*
-7.09%
10Y*
12.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GRID vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRID has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GRID vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLN
QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRID vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRIDQCLNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

1.63

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.04

2.23

+0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.27

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

3.97

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.64

12.27

+3.37

GRID vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRID Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRID and QCLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRIDQCLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.63

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

-0.19

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.37

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.15

+0.38

Correlation

The correlation between GRID and QCLN is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GRID vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than QCLN's 0.21% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index
0.90%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
0.21%0.25%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.24%0.72%

Drawdowns

GRID vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and QCLN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GRIDQCLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.56%

-76.18%

+35.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-16.18%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-69.49%

+39.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

-71.73%

+31.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.55%

-45.67%

+39.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.50%

-43.54%

+35.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

5.24%

-2.10%

Volatility

GRID vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) is 8.59%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 13.73%. This indicates that GRID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GRIDQCLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.59%

13.73%

-5.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.24%

27.33%

-13.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.49%

37.76%

-16.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.69%

37.87%

-17.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.74%

34.62%

-11.88%