PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWTYX vs. PALDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWTYX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS U.S. Allocation Fund (PWTYX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PWTYX having a 8.03% return and PALDX slightly lower at 7.89%.


PWTYX

1D
0.14%
1M
3.48%
YTD
8.03%
6M
8.62%
1Y
23.06%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
7.92%
10Y*
9.95%

PALDX

1D
0.40%
1M
3.05%
YTD
7.89%
6M
8.61%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWTYX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PWTYX
UBS U.S. Allocation Fund
8.03%13.28%14.01%17.73%-17.04%16.19%17.66%23.75%-7.80%4.69%
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
7.89%13.62%18.96%18.90%-15.65%16.30%10.68%22.27%-4.12%5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PWTYX and PALDX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017

0.92

The correlation between PWTYX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWTYX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWTYX
PWTYX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PWTYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWTYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWTYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PWTYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWTYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

PALDX
PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWTYX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS U.S. Allocation Fund (PWTYX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PWTYXPALDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.57

2.76

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.72

3.95

-0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.52

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

3.65

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.18

17.34

-2.16

PWTYX vs. PALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWTYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the PALDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWTYX and PALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PWTYXPALDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

2.76

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.79

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.81

-0.28

Drawdowns

PWTYX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWTYX drawdown since its inception was -51.86%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWTYX and PALDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWTYXPALDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.86%

-26.16%

-25.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.87%

-5.96%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.40%

-16.06%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.84%

-20.47%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.61%

-4.09%

-3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

1.25%

+0.50%

Volatility

PWTYX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison

UBS U.S. Allocation Fund (PWTYX) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) at 2.29%. This indicates that PWTYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWTYXPALDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

2.29%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.19%

6.19%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.88%

7.91%

+1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.19%

12.11%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.94%

12.70%

+0.24%

PWTYX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWTYX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PWTYX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison

PWTYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.68%, more than PALDX's 5.02% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
5.02%5.42%10.40%2.94%6.19%6.87%2.58%4.58%3.65%1.48%0.00%
PWTYX
UBS U.S. Allocation Fund
8.68%9.38%8.32%1.61%9.95%16.86%5.85%2.22%11.82%2.53%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


PWTYX and PALDX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWTYX has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to PALDX (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWTYX dropped -51.86% vs PALDX's -26.16%.

PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWTYX and PALDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer