PWRZ vs. XES

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) and XES (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. PWRZ is actively managed, while XES is passively managed. PWRZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XES.

Performance

PWRZ vs. XES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PWRZ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XES

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -8.31%
• 6M: 24.76%
• YTD: 35.23%
• 1Y: 64.19%
• 3Y*: 10.77%
• 5Y*: 13.82%
• 10Y*: -3.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWRZ vs. XES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF	0.00%
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF	-1.14%

Return for Risk

PWRZ vs. XES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWRZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XES

XES Risk / Return Rank: 77
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 71
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWRZ vs. XES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PWRZ	XES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.09	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.71	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.33	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.12	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.48	—

Drawdowns

PWRZ vs. XES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWRZ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum XES drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRZ and XES.

Drawdown Indicators

	PWRZ	XES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-95.65%	+95.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-20.69%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-45.95%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.95%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-91.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-73.88%	+73.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-54.44%	+54.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.61%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PWRZ	XES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.16%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.53%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	30.95%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	38.86%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	44.88%	—

PWRZ vs. XES - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWRZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XES's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PWRZ vs. XES - Dividend Comparison

PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF	1.18%	1.69%	1.31%	0.66%	0.36%	1.81%	1.33%	1.43%	1.14%	1.68%	0.64%	2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, PWRZ or XES?

On fees, XES is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PWRZ or XES?

XES is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PWRZ or XES?

XES has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.

What is the main difference between PWRZ and XES?

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRZ and 0.35% for XES.