PWRD vs. PXJ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PWRD (TCW Transform Systems ETF) and PXJ (Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. PWRD is actively managed, while PXJ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PWRD returned 33.16%/yr vs 24.32%/yr for PXJ. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PWRD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for PXJ.

Performance

PWRD vs. PXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWRD achieves a 21.92% return, which is significantly lower than PXJ's 42.12% return.

PWRD

• 1D: -4.36%
• 1M: 4.92%
• YTD: 21.92%
• 6M: 19.81%
• 1Y: 36.33%
• 3Y*: 33.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PXJ

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -8.62%
• YTD: 42.12%
• 6M: 42.80%
• 1Y: 74.07%
• 3Y*: 24.32%
• 5Y*: 17.58%
• 10Y*: -1.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWRD vs. PXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF	21.92%	32.84%	28.54%	20.83%	-3.18%
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	42.12%	8.74%	0.21%	14.44%	35.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PWRD and PXJ is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2022	0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between PWRD and PXJ has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PWRD vs. PXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWRD

PWRD Risk / Return Rank: 46
PWRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
PWRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
PWRD Omega Ratio Rank: 40
PWRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
PWRD Martin Ratio Rank: 52

PXJ

PXJ Risk / Return Rank: 87
PXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 79
PXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
PXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWRD vs. PXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PWRD	PXJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	2.81	-1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	3.57	-1.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.44	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	5.79	-3.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.57	19.22	-10.65

PWRD vs. PXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWRD Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the PXJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWRD and PXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PWRD vs. PXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWRD drawdown since its inception was -25.87%, smaller than the maximum PXJ drawdown of -94.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRD and PXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PWRD	PXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.87%	-94.82%	+68.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.12%	-12.86%	-1.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.87%	-40.03%	+14.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.03%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-87.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.36%	-67.53%	+63.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.07%	-55.69%	+50.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.25%	3.87%	+0.38%

Volatility

PWRD vs. PXJ - Volatility Comparison

TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) has a higher volatility of 10.84% compared to Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) at 8.62%. This indicates that PWRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PWRD	PXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.84%	8.62%	+2.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.67%	18.50%	+2.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.31%	26.77%	-1.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.89%	34.48%	-11.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.89%	39.34%	-16.45%

PWRD vs. PXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWRD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PXJ's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

PWRD vs. PXJ - Dividend Comparison

PWRD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF	0.00%	0.22%	0.49%	0.78%	0.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	2.46%	2.91%	3.34%	1.99%	0.65%	2.40%	4.72%	1.87%	0.99%	2.75%	1.18%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PWRD and PXJ in my portfolio?

PWRD and PXJ have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PWRD or PXJ?

PWRD has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to PXJ (8.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWRD dropped -25.87% vs PXJ's -94.82%.

Which ETF is better, PWRD or PXJ?

On 3-year performance, PWRD leads with 33.16% vs 24.32% for PXJ. On fees, PXJ is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, PXJ has been the lower-risk option at 8.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PWRD or PXJ?

Over the 3-year period, PWRD has performed better with a 33.16% return vs 24.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PWRD or PXJ?

PXJ is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PWRD or PXJ?

PXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.00% for PWRD.

What is the main difference between PWRD and PXJ?

They also come from different issuers: TCW and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRD and 0.63% for PXJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.