PWRD vs. DTCR
PWRD (TCW Transform Systems ETF) and DTCR (Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWRD is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TCW, while DTCR is a REIT fund tracking the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. PWRD is actively managed, while DTCR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PWRD returned 26.89%/yr vs 27.27%/yr for DTCR. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PWRD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DTCR.
Performance
PWRD vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWRD achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly lower than DTCR's 30.53% return.
PWRD
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -6.14%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- YTD
- 12.31%
- 1Y
- 16.15%
- 3Y*
- 26.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.73%
DTCR
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -3.58%
- 6M
- 12.55%
- YTD
- 30.53%
- 1Y
- 47.91%
- 3Y*
- 27.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $22.41M | $38.68M | $44.72M | |
| $9.89M | $10.00M | $12.60M |
PWRD vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 12.31% | 32.84% | 28.54% | 20.83% | -3.18% |
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 30.53% | 28.99% | 14.92% | 18.93% | -21.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWRD and DTCR is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2022 | 0.64 |
The correlation between PWRD and DTCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWRD vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank
PWRD
DTCR
PWRD vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWRD | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.30 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 2.55 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 8.11 | -5.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWRD vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWRD drawdown since its inception was -25.87%, smaller than the maximum DTCR drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRD and DTCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWRD | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.87% | -38.98% | +13.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.46% | -17.88% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.87% | -24.96% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.22% | -15.15% | +2.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -12.26% | +7.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.13% | 5.62% | -0.49% |
Volatility
PWRD vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison
TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) has a higher volatility of 10.66% compared to Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) at 8.80%. This indicates that PWRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWRD | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.66% | 8.80% | +1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.72% | 19.77% | +3.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.86% | 24.75% | +3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.45% | 22.50% | +0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.45% | 22.25% | +1.20% |
PWRD vs. DTCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWRD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DTCR's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWRD vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison
PWRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than DTCR's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 0.90% | 1.10% | 1.72% | 1.18% | 2.57% | 1.27% | 0.30% |
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 0.06% | 0.22% | 0.49% | 0.78% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWRD and DTCR have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWRD has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to DTCR (8.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWRD dropped -25.87% vs DTCR's -38.98%.
On 3-year performance, DTCR leads with 27.27% vs 26.89% for PWRD. On fees, DTCR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DTCR has been the lower-risk option at 8.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DTCR has performed better with a 27.27% return vs 26.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DTCR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRD.
DTCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.06% for PWRD.
PWRD is categorized as Energy Equities, while DTCR is REIT. They also come from different issuers: TCW and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRD and 0.50% for DTCR.
DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWRD and DTCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer