PWRD vs. SPMO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PWRD (TCW Transform Systems ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWRD is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TCW, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. PWRD is actively managed, while SPMO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PWRD returned 29.54%/yr vs 40.56%/yr for SPMO. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PWRD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.

Performance

PWRD vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWRD achieves a 17.32% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 26.03% return.

PWRD

• 1D: -2.11%
• 1M: -0.92%
• 6M: 12.50%
• YTD: 17.32%
• 1Y: 26.01%
• 3Y*: 29.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPMO

• 1D: -2.61%
• 1M: -1.65%
• 6M: 24.83%
• YTD: 26.03%
• 1Y: 34.61%
• 3Y*: 40.56%
• 5Y*: 21.26%
• 10Y*: 20.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWRD vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF	17.32%	32.84%	28.54%	20.83%	-3.18%
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF	26.03%	26.58%	45.82%	17.56%	-7.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PWRD and SPMO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2022	0.80

The correlation between PWRD and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PWRD vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWRD

PWRD Risk / Return Rank: 38
PWRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
PWRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
PWRD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
PWRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
PWRD Martin Ratio Rank: 45

SPMO

SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 62
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWRD vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PWRD	SPMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	1.57	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	2.13	-0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.29	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	2.74	-0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.89	9.73	-3.84

PWRD vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWRD Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWRD and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PWRD vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWRD drawdown since its inception was -25.87%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRD and SPMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PWRD	SPMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.87%	-30.95%	+5.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.12%	-12.70%	-1.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.87%	-20.13%	-5.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.74%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.30%	-7.38%	-0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.07%	-4.59%	-0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.42%	3.56%	+0.86%

Volatility

PWRD vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) have volatilities of 12.92% and 12.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PWRD	SPMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.92%	12.53%	+0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.51%	19.77%	+2.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.76%	22.23%	+4.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.21%	20.25%	+2.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.21%	20.80%	+2.41%

PWRD vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWRD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

PWRD vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

PWRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than SPMO's 0.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF	0.05%	0.22%	0.49%	0.78%	0.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF	0.70%	0.73%	0.48%	1.63%	1.66%	0.52%	1.27%	1.39%	1.05%	0.77%	1.94%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PWRD and SPMO in my portfolio?

PWRD and SPMO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PWRD or SPMO?

PWRD has higher volatility (12.92%) compared to SPMO (12.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWRD dropped -25.87% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

Which ETF is better, PWRD or SPMO?

On 3-year performance, SPMO leads with 40.56% vs 29.54% for PWRD. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 12.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PWRD or SPMO?

Over the 3-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 40.56% return vs 29.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PWRD or SPMO?

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PWRD or SPMO?

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.05% for PWRD.

What is the main difference between PWRD and SPMO?

PWRD is categorized as Energy Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: TCW and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRD and 0.13% for SPMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.